Effectiveness and Complication Profiles of Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review
Downloads
Abstract
Cataract is the most common cause of the reversible loss of sight globally. Given that phacoemulsification is regarded as the gold standard, manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) still has an important role to play in resource limited settings. This systematical literature review assessed the outcomes in terms of effectiveness, visual outcomes, and complication rates of current cataract surgery techniques. Systematical search of literature was performed in Pub Med and ScienceDirect for papers published from 2021 to 2026, which compared cataract surgical techniques. Studies that included adult patients undergoing cataract surgery with follow-up data postoperatively for visual outcome and/or complications were included. The qualitative synthesis resulted in 607 records being screened and 32 studies being included which involved 200000 eyes. Study characteristics, surgical procedures and visual results and complications were retrieved and quantified. Appropriate methodological tools were used to evaluate the risk of bias. Both Phaco and MSICS had excellent visual improvement following the surgery, and the long-term visual recovery was similar in both groups except for rare cases where the surgery was complicated by retinal problems such as posterior capsular opacity (PCO) sometimes caused by intra-operative capsular balloon (IOB) removal. Phaco achieved superior results in early postoperative uncorrected visual acuity and smaller size of incision, resulting in less SIA. In dense nuclear cataract, however, MSICS was found to have lower endothelial cell loss without any loss in its cost-effectiveness in low resource areas. The most common complications reported were posterior capsule opacity and posterior capsule rupture. Advanced age and surgical complications were also related to outcomes. The techniques (phaco and MSICS) provided good visual outcomes after the cataract surgery. The surgical selection should be customized according to the severity of the cataract, the presence of intraocular co-morbidities and the surgeon's skills and health care resource availability.
Keywords:
Cataract, Phacoemulsification, Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) and Visual Outcomes.References
[1] A. A. A. Abd Elrasol, T.-E. M. Othman, A. M. E. A. Abdalla, and A. F. Gabr, “Comparative Study between Corneal Topographic Changes Following Phacoemulsification and Small Incision Cataract Surgery,” The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 1832–1838, 2021.
[2] I. Ahmed Bhutto, I. Ali, M. N. Memon, A. Shah Bukhari, I. Indhar, and N. Ahmed Memon, “Comparison of Visual Outcome in Senile Cataract after Phacoemulsification and Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery,” International Journal of Endorsing Health Science Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 143–148, 2021.
[3] S. A. AlRyalat, D. Atieh, A. AlHabashneh, M. Hassouneh, R. Toukan, R. Alawamleh, T. Alshammari, and M. Abu-Ameerh, “Predictors of Visual Acuity Improvement after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 9, 894541, 2022.
[4] M. I. Asif, R. Sinha, S. Anjum, P. Sahay, R. Singh, T. Agarwal, N. Sharma, and J. S. Titiyal, “Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification in Vitrectomized Eyes: A Prospective Interventional Study,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 72, no. 9, pp. 1285–1290, 2024.
[5] M. O. Atima, U. Idakwo, O. Komolafe, E. Shimizu, N. Shintaro, E. O. Balogun, E. J. Dingwoke, A. J. Orugun, O. A. Ogundare, and P. D. Jah, “Long-Term Outcomes of Phacoemulsification Surgeries at ECWA Eye Hospital: A Prospective Clinical Cohort Study,” Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2024, 2562064, 2024.
[6] A. D. Bui, Z. Sun, Y. Wang, S. Huang, M. Ryan, Y. Yu, G.-S. Ying, S. Ramanathan, K. Singh, Y. Yang, and Y. Han, “Factors Impacting Cumulative Dissipated Energy Levels and Postoperative Visual Acuity Outcome in Cataract Surgery,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 21, no. 1, 439, 2021.
[7] N. Dervenis, A. Praidou, P. Dervenis, D. Chiras, and B. Little, “Visual Acuity Outcomes after Phacoemulsification in Eyes with Good Visual Acuity before Cataract Surgery,” Medical Principles and Practice, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 285–291, 2021.
[8] K. Dole, N. Baheti, R. Deshpande, S. Kulkarni, R. Shetty, and M. Deshpande, “Comparative Study of Anatomical and Functional Recovery of Eye along with Patient Satisfaction Score after Small-Incision Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 3942–3947, 2022.
[9] M. J. E. D. H. Elshaar, M. M. Elsayed, A. H. Aldghaimy, and W. Elshazly, “Visual Outcome and Postoperative Complications after Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery versus Phacoemulsification,” SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2022.
[10] “Factors Associated With Postoperative Complications in Adult Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery at KCMC Hospital 2023–2024,” n.d.
[11] A. Goel, M. Das, and S. Sen, “Comparative Analysis of Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery versus Phacoemulsification for Brown Cataracts,” Cureus, 2024.
[12] K. Jaiswal, R. Rathi, A. Jain, A. Gaur, and N. Nema, “Visual Outcome and Complications in White Mature Cataracts after Phacoemulsification,” Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 129–135, 2023.
[13] A. Jimmy Zitha and N. Rampersad, “Cataract Surgery Outcomes: Comparison of the Extracapsular Cataract Extraction and Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery Techniques,” African Health Sciences, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 619–629, 2022.
[14] G. Kohli, C. Shah, A. Sen, R. Joshi, D. Sood, N. Patidar, P. Sen, D. Sharma, and T. Jain, “Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Associated Coloboma: Predictors of Outcome and Safety of Different Surgical Techniques,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 937–945, 2021.
[15] N. Kumar, G. Kaur, C. Chadha, N. Sethi, N. Gupta, and S. Gauri, “Visual Outcome after Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery by Viscoexpression Technique,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 3933–3937, 2022.
[16] S. Kyei, E. Zaabaar, F. Assiamah, M. A. Kwarteng, and K. Asiedu, “Comparison of the Outcomes of Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery (MSICS) and Phacoemulsification (PHACO) in Ghana,” Annals of African Surgery, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 143–149, 2021.
[17] T. H. T. Lai, J. Y. T. Tse, J. W. T. Chan, and K. K. W. Li, “Visual and Refractive Outcomes after Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery in Nanophthalmic Eyes,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 13, no. 19, 5852, 2024.
[18] M. Li, Y. Jin, and J. Hu, “Comparative Evaluation of Phacoemulsification Combined with Goniosynechialysis with Goniotomy versus Trabeculectomy in Patients with Angle-Closure Glaucoma and Cataract,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 25, no. 1, 100, 2025.
[19] S. Medhi, R. Senthil Prasad, A. Pai, G. R. Muthukrishnan, A. Mariammal, R. Chitradevi, and M. Shekhar, “Clinical Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery versus Conventional Phacoemulsification: A Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Eye Care Center in South India,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 4300–4305, 2022.
[20] M. A. U. Mannan, K. K. Anjum, and F. Zahid, “Comparison of Incentive Spirometry and Peak Expiratory Flow Meter to Evaluate Cardio-Respiratory Parameters after Valvular Surgery,” Medical Journal of South Punjab, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–7, 2024.
[21] M. I. Munaje, O. T. Aribaba, M. O. Atima, U. Idakwo, J. D. Pam, E. J. Dingwoke, and N. B. Gandi, “Phaco-Trabeculectomy versus MSICS-Trabeculectomy for Coexisting Cataract and Glaucoma: Visual and IOP Outcomes from a Randomized Trial in Nigeria,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 25, no. 1, 621, 2025.
[22] K. Nampradit and P. Kongsap, “The Visual Outcomes and Complications of Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery and Phacoemulsification: Long Term Results,” Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2021.
[23] M. Pathak, A. Odayappan, M. Nath, R. Raman, S. Bhandari, and S. Nachiappan, “Comparison of the Outcomes of Phacoemulsification and Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery in Posterior Polar Cataract: A Retrospective Study,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 3977–3981, 2022.
[24] H. Qu, A. Abulimiti, J. Liang, S. Zhou, Z. Wu, Y. Chen, R. Ju, Z. Wang, R. Xu, and X. Chen, “Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens with Phacoemulsification and Femtosecond Laser Assisted Cataract Surgery,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 24, no. 1, 189, 2024.
[25] M. S. Ravindra, S. Singh, K. R. Meda, and D. R. Meda, “Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery under Topical Anesthesia for Post-Uveitis Complicated Cataract,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 3923–3926, 2022.
[26] N. Sa’at, A. K. Ghazali, N. M. Yaacob, and M. A. Salowi, “Factors Influencing Visual Improvement after Phacoemulsification Surgery among Malaysian Cataract Patients,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 18, 11485, 2022.
[27] M. Shehata, M. O. M. Aly, M. G. A. Saleh, and M. Abdel-Radi, “Twelve Month Outcome of Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery in Assiut, Egypt: A Retrospective Study with a Large Sample Size,” Oman Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 326–330, 2022.
[28] M. Shekhar, S. Chaudhary, A. Pai, V. Rajesh, L. Balakrishnan, K. Nagu, and H. K. Wijesinghe, “Visual Outcomes and Risk Factors of Uveitis Cataract Eyes after Phacoemulsification and Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 257–263, 2024.
[29] R. Singh, A. K. Sharma, V. Katiyar, G. Kumar, and S. K. Gupta, “Corneal Endothelial Changes Following Cataract Surgery in Hard Nuclear Cataract: Randomized Trial Comparing Phacoemulsification to Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 3904–3909, 2022.
[30] Y. Wan, K. Cao, J. Wang, Y. Sun, R. Du, Z. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Wang, and N. Wang, “Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy (GATT) Combined Phacoemulsification Surgery: Outcomes at a 2-Year Follow-Up,” Eye, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1258–1263, 2023.
[31] C. Warad, A. Tenagi, P. Satarasi, D. Goyal, R. Mendpara, U. Harakuni, S. C. Bubanale, S. K. S., B. K. B., and V. Wani, “Visual Outcome Following Manual Small Incision Cataract Surgery at a Tertiary Center in South India,” Cureus, 2021.
[32] J. C. Yosar, S. L. Zagora, and J. R. Grigg, “Cataract Surgery in Short Eyes, Including Nanophthalmos: Visual Outcomes, Complications and Refractive Results,” Clinical Ophthalmology, vol. 15, pp. 4543–4551, 2021.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cindy Eka Wijaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
