Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): November 2026
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Formulation and Characterization of Gypsum and Silicone-Based Materials Based on Hounsfield Unit Values as a Basis For Developing Anthropomorphic Phantoms on Ct-Scan

Authors

Lensy Novitasari , Siti Masrochah , Sigit Wijokongko

Downloads

Received: 2026-10-22
Accepted: 2026-11-03
Published: 2026-11-03

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) imaging requires phantoms with tissue-equivalent Hounsfield Unit (HU) values, but commercial anthropomorphic phantoms are expensive and have limited flexibility. This study aims to formulate and characterize gypsum and silicone-based materials based on HU values ​​as a basis for developing anthropomorphic CT phantoms. The study used a quantitative Research and Development (R&D) design with the ADDIE model. The population included potential materials for phantoms and anonymized CT images of patient heads. The sample consisted of six material formulas (two gypsum, four silicone) and 20 patient CT images. Instruments included a multislice CT scanner, a DICOM viewer with ROI tools, and precision measurement equipment. Data analysis used descriptive statistics on density, mean HU, percentage error, coefficient of variation (CV), HU difference between ROIs, and physical stability. The results showed that five of the six formulas met the accuracy criteria (error ≤15%), namely cortical gypsum (1.2%), trabecular gypsum (4.8%), muscle silicone (0.5%), gray matter silicone (9.9%), and white matter silicone (5.9%). Skin silicone exceeded the limit (26.2%). All materials showed excellent repeatability (CV 0.15–1.10%). The silicone material was homogeneous (HU difference ≤5 HU), while the gypsum was not homogeneous (12.7–13.0 HU). All phantoms were physically stable. Gypsum and silicone materials have the potential to be economical candidates for anthropomorphic CT phantoms, with the need for optimization of the skin silicone formula and gypsum homogeneity.

Keywords:

Computed Tomography, Gypsum, Hounsfield Unit, Anthropomorphic Phantom, Silicone

References

[1] A. Sabarudin, Z. Mustafa, K. M. Nassir, H. Abdul Hamid, and Z. Sun, “Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and abdomen–pelvic CT using tube current modulation: A phantom study,” Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 319–328, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5135.

[2] M. Ruschin, S. R. H. Davidson, W. Phounsy, T. S. Yoo, L. Chin, J.-P. Pignol, A. Ravi, and C. McCann, “Technical note: Multipurpose CT, ultrasound, and MRI breast phantom for use in radiotherapy and minimally invasive interventions,” Medical Physics, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2508–2514, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4947124.

[3] H. H. Chen-Mayer, M. K. Fuld, B. Hoppel, P. F. Judy, J. P. Sieren, J. Guo, D. A. Lynch, A. Possolo, and S. B. Fain, “Standardizing CT lung density measure across scanner manufacturers,” Medical Physics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 974–985, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12087.

[4] J. Lehmann, R. L. Stern, J. Levy, T. Daly, C. L. Hartmann Siantar, and Z. Goldberg, “Radiation phantom with humanoid shape and adjustable thickness (RPHAT),” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 49, no. 9, p. N02, 2004, doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/N02.

[5] J.-K. Wu, M.-C. Yu, S.-H. Chen, S.-H. Liao, and Y.-J. Wang, “Low cost multifunctional 3D printed image quality and dose verification phantom for an image-guided radiotherapy system,” PLOS ONE, vol. 17, no. 4, Art. no. e0266604, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266604.

[6] S. Medeiros Oliveira Ramos, S. Thomas, M. Bárbara Torres Berdeguez, L. Vasconcellos de Sá, and S. Augusto Lopes de Souza, “Anthropomorphic phantoms—Potential for more studies and training in radiology,” International Journal of Radiology & Radiation Therapy, vol. 2, no. 4, Art. no. 00033, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.15406/ijrrt.2017.02.00033.

[7] M. Sofyan, A. O. Hidayati, and A. N. Mayani, “Pembuatan phantom dari gips sebagai pengganti tulang manusia dan bahan akrilik sebagai pengganti soft tissue,” Journal of Health, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 107–113, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.30590/vol4-no2-p107-113.

[8] H. Trisna and A. Mahyudin, “Analisis sifat fisis dan mekanik papan komposit gipsum serat ijuk dengan penambahan boraks (dinatrium tetraborat decahydrate),” Jurnal Fisika Unand, vol. 1, no. 1, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.25077/jfu.1.1.%25p.2012.

[9] A. Ansar, D. Tahir, B. Abdullah, Nurhasmi, S. Fatimah, and Jusmawang, “Physical characteristics of soft tissue phantom from silicone rubber based vulcanization system,” Materials Science Forum, vol. 966, pp. 194–199, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.966.194.

Author Biographies

Lensy Novitasari, Ministry of Health Polytechnic of Health Semarang, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Siti Masrochah, Ministry of Health Polytechnic of Health Semarang, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Sigit Wijokongko, Ministry of Health Polytechnic of Health Semarang, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Lensy Novitasari, Siti Masrochah, & Sigit Wijokongko. (2026). Formulation and Characterization of Gypsum and Silicone-Based Materials Based on Hounsfield Unit Values as a Basis For Developing Anthropomorphic Phantoms on Ct-Scan. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i4.831

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.