Legal Protection of The Subdivision of Freehold Title Certificates (Shm) as The Basis For Consumer Rights In Sale and Purchase Binding Agreements (PPJB) For Housing Transactions

Authors

  • Era Fortuna Istanlama Department of Law, Master of Notary, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Lego Karjoko lecturer, Department of Law, Master of Notary, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Hari Purwadi lecturer, Department of Law, Master of Notary, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.729

Abstract

Currently, the demand for residential housing is very high. Therefore, the government permits the transfer of land rights based on a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB), provided that certain requirements are met. One of the requirements is that the agreement must be executed before an authorized Notary, the housing development must have reached at least 20% construction progress, and the developer must have obtained a building permit issued by the relevant government authority. This study aims to examine the legal protection concerning the implementation of the subdivision of Freehold Title Certificates (Hak Milik) as a basis for consumer protection under the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) in housing transactions. It also analyzes the legal framework governing liability in relation to such legal protection. This research employs a normative legal research method. The legal materials used consist of two types, namely primary and secondary legal materials. The legal materials were collected through library research, while the approaches adopted in this study are the statutory approach and the conceptual case approach. The results of the study indicate that consumers obtain legal protection in a PPJB once they have fully paid the purchase price and the PPJB has been executed before a Notary. Furthermore, if the developer breaches the PPJB, legal protection for consumers may initially be pursued through deliberation to reach a mutual agreement. If no agreement can be reached, consumers may file a lawsuit before the general courts or, alternatively, resolve the dispute through out-of-court mechanisms, which are generally conducted through arbitration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Ambarwati, Azkia Dwi. “Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah yang Terikat Jaminan Bank (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 704K/PDT/2016)”. Jurnal Notary. Vol. 1, No. 1 (2009). Hlm. 31 J. Satrio, Hukum Perikatan, Perikatan Yang Lahir dari Perjanjian, Buku I, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2001), hlm. 355

[2]. Amin, Muh. Taufiq. “Konsekuensi Hukum Pembatalan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) dalam Praktek Jual Beli Properti di Makassar”. Jurisprudentie Volume 5, Nomor 1 (Juni 2018). Hlm. 249

[3]. Aziizi, Syarifah Nurul. “Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dan Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Terhadap Penyerahan Kembali Sertipikat Sebagai Objek Dalam Pengikatan Jual Beli (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 623/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Dps)” Indonesian Notary Vol 2, No 001 (2020). Hlm. 831-851.

[4]. Hutagalung, Arie. S. “Dinamika Pengaturan Rumah Susun Atau Apartemen”. Hukum dan Pembangunan (Vol. 34, No 4 (2004)). hlm. 317.

[5]. Nafis, Yadzka. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Beritikad Baik Dalam Jual Beli Tanah Di Kota Solok (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1826 K/PDT/2014)” Indonesian Notary Vol 2, No 001 (2020). Hlm. 358-377

[6]. Pawana, Sekhar Chandra. “Konsepsi Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Rumah Susun Milik Sebagai Sebuah Panjer.” Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan. Hlm. 7-14.

[7]. Rani, Haneke. “Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dan Kuasa Menjual Yang Dianggap Sebagai Akta Pura-Pura Ditinjau Dari Kausa Perjanjian Terkait Dengan Pasal 1320 Juncto Pasal 1335 KUHPerdata (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 1031/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Dps)” Indonesian Notary Vol 1, No 004 (2019). Hlm. 1-19.

[8]. Setyowati, Retno Kus dan Asmaniar. “Pembatalan Transaksi Hak Atas Tanah Oleh Penjual Dengan Alasan Belum Lunas,” Binamulia Hukum. Vol. 9, Nomor 1 (Juli 2020). hlm. 6

[9]. Silviana, Dyah Ayu, Endang Sri Santi dan Triyono. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah yang dibuat dibawah tangan oleh PT. Cisadane Perdana di Kota Depok”. “Diponegoro Law Journal” (Vol. 1, No. 2 (2013). Hlm. 1.

[10]. Triyanto dan Habib Adjie. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Atas Perjanjian Pendahuluan Dalam Jual Beli Atas Satuan Rumah Susun Yang Dipasarkan Dengan Cara Pre Project Selling”. Res Judicata (Vol. 1, No 1 (Juni 2004)). hlm. 59.

[11]. Yudhantaka, Lintang. “Keabsahan Kontrak Jual Beli Rumah Susun Dengan Sistem Pre Project Selling”. Yuridika (Vol. 32, No 1 (Januari 2017)). hlm. 88.

[12]. Zakia, Inaz. “Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Secara Angsuran Dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Berdasarkan Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 884 PK/PDT/2018” Indonesian Notary Vol 2, No 002 (2020). Hlm. 1-21.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-20

How to Cite

Era Fortuna Istanlama, Lego Karjoko, & Hari Purwadi. (2026). Legal Protection of The Subdivision of Freehold Title Certificates (Shm) as The Basis For Consumer Rights In Sale and Purchase Binding Agreements (PPJB) For Housing Transactions. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(2), 2095–2106. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.729

Issue

Section

Articles