Carbon Policy Effectiveness in Indonesia's Electricity Generation Subsector

Authors

  • Tasya Dwi Farlian Putri Departement of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia
  • Arie Dipareza Syafei Departement of Environmental Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Sukolilo, Surabaya 60111, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.679

Abstract

Climate change has increased the urgency of strengthening greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation policies in energy systems. In Indonesia, the electricity generation subsector is strategically important because it remains closely linked to fossil fuel use while also becoming a central arena of national energy transition policy. This study aims to develop a system dynamics model for simulating the effect of carbon policy on GHG emissions in Indonesia's electricity generation subsector, evaluating the effectiveness of existing carbon policy pathways, and formulating policy directions based on scenario results and policy lessons from selected countries. The study applies a quantitative system dynamics approach using Causal Loop Diagram and Stock and Flow Diagram modelling in Vensim. The model represents interactions among demographic drivers, electricity demand, fossil and renewable generation capacity, fossil fuel consumption, carbon policy variables, and GHG emissions. Three scenarios were simulated: a baseline scenario, a 2030 medium-term target scenario, and a 2060 Net Zero Emission scenario. Model validation using MAPE indicated acceptable historical fit for population and power-generation emission variables. The results show that the baseline follows a high-emission pathway under weak policy pressure. The 2030 scenario reduces emissions to 196.42 MtCO2, below the 250 MtCO2 target. However, the 2060 scenario still leaves 127 MtCO2e of residual emissions, indicating that the Net Zero target is not fully achieved. The findings suggest that carbon policy is effective in the medium term but requires stronger integration with coal phase-down, renewable expansion, MRV, enforcement, and transition finance for long-term mitigation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C. Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C.

[2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. IPCC.

[3] World Resources Institute. (2023). 4 charts explain greenhouse gas emissions by countries and sectors. World Resources Institute.

[4] Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Enhanced Nationally Determined Contribution of Republic Indonesia.

[5] United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2025). Second nationally determined contribution of the Republic of Indonesia.

[6] International Energy Agency. (2023). CO2 emissions 2022. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25984-5_300288

[7] PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara. (2025). Bahan paparan Direktur Utama PLN.

[8] Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia. (2023, September 26). Menteri ESDM luncurkan perdagangan karbon subsektor pembangkit listrik.

[9] Directorate General of Electricity, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2024). Kementerian ESDM terbitkan aturan acuan nilai ekonomi karbon subsektor listrik.

[10] World Bank Group. (2025). State and trends of carbon pricing. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-2255-1

[11] Borissov, K., & Bretschger, L. (2018). Optimal carbon policies in a dynamic heterogenous world. Economics Working Paper Series 18/297, ETH Zürich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000294528

[12] Kohlscheen, E., Moessner, R., & Takats, E. (2021). Effects of carbon pricing and other climate policies on CO2 emissions. CESifo Working Papers, No. 9347.

[13] Stechemesser, A., et al. (2022). Climate policies that achieved major emission reductions: Global evidence from two decades. Nature Climate Change.

[14] European Commission Climate Action. (2026a). About the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS).

[15] European Commission Climate Action. (2026b). Auctioning allowances under the EU emissions trading system (EU ETS).

[16] Twidale, S. (2024, September 29). Britain to become first G7 country to end coal power as last plant closes. Reuters.

[17] Twidale, S. (2026, April 16). Britain to scrap carbon tax on electricity generation from April 2028. Reuters.

[18] Buli, N. (2025, August 25). Norway's Northern Lights CCS project starts operations with first CO2 injected. Reuters.

[19] United Nations Development Programme. (2026). Indonesia Just Energy Transition Partnership (JETP).

[20] Owojori, O. M., & Anwana, E. (2025). Climate governance in the BRICS: Pathways toward net-zero emissions. Discover Sustainability.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Dwi Farlian Putri, T., & Arie Dipareza Syafei. (2026). Carbon Policy Effectiveness in Indonesia’s Electricity Generation Subsector. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(2), 1853–1861. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.679

Issue

Section

Articles