Regional Inspectorate Strategies for Achieving Good Governance in Bogor Regency West Java Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.606Abstract
The implementation of good governance is essential for creating an effective, transparent, accountable, and corruption-free government system. As the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus (APIP), the Bogor Regency Inspectorate plays a strategic role through supervisory, consultative, guidance, and preventive functions. However, supervisory implementation still faces challenges, including limited human resources, high workloads, differences in audit perceptions, and the suboptimal expansion of supervisory functions. This study aims to analyze the strategies implemented by the Bogor Regency Inspectorate in achieving good governance, identify supporting and inhibiting factors, and examine efforts to overcome existing obstacles. This study is based on the good governance framework developed by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP, 1997) and SWOT analysis theory proposed by Rangkuti (2016). A qualitative method with a descriptive approach was employed. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, then analyzed using the SWOT framework. The findings show that the Bogor Regency Inspectorate has implemented S-O, W-O, S-T, and W-T strategies through preventive, consultative, guidance, and risk-based supervision approaches. Supporting factors include regulatory support, competent human resources, inter-agency cooperation, SPIP implementation, and bureaucratic reform. Inhibiting factors include the limited number of auditors and PPUPD personnel, high workloads, differences in audit perceptions, and the limited expansion of supervisory functions. Efforts to address these challenges include strengthening APIP capability, improving human resource quality, digitalizing supervisory processes, reinforcing SPIP implementation, applying risk management, and enhancing collaboration with external supervisory institutions. These strategies contribute to strengthening the Inspectorate’s role in supporting the realization of good governance in Bogor Regency.
Downloads
References
[1] Agustin, N. Y. (2022). Analisis determinan kualitas audit (Studi kasus pada Kantor Inspektorat Daerah Kabupaten Lumajang). https://sipora.polije.ac.id/13233
[2] Arikunto, S. (2007). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Bogor Regency Inspectorate. (2024). Laporan kinerja instansi pemerintah (LKIP) Inspektorat Kabupaten Bogor Tahun 2024.
[3] Bogor Regency Inspectorate. (2025). Laporan hasil evaluasi atas implementasi SAKIP Tahun Anggaran 2024 di lingkungan Pemerintah Kabupaten Bogor.
BPKP. (2024). Laporan kinerja BPKP Triwulan I Tahun 2024.
[4] Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the American industrial enterprise. MIT Press.
[5] Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.
[6] Dwiyanto, A. (2006). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.
[7] Institute of Internal Auditors. (2017). International professional practices framework (IPPF). The Institute of Internal Auditors.
[8] Irawan, P. (2000). Metodologi penelitian sosial. STIA-LAN Press.
[9] Juansa, R. (2019). Peran inspektorat sebagai pengawas internal pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Kuantan Singingi. https://repository.uir.ac.id/8309/1/177322032.pdf
[11] Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Laporan survei penilaian integritas Pemerintah Kabupaten Bogor Tahun 2024.
[12] Koontz, H., & O’Donnell, C. (1980). Principles of management: An analysis of managerial functions. McGraw-Hill.
[13] Lestariningrum, N., & Sarwono, A. E. (2021). Analisis pengaruh komitmen organisasi, pengelolaan keuangan daerah dan kinerja aparatur terhadap good governance (Survey pada aparatur pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Wonogiri). Jurnal Akuntansi. https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Akuntansi/article/view/6241
[14] Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
[15] Moleong, L. J. (2009). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nazir, M. (2005). Metode penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
[16] Nisrina, A. F. (2023). Motivasi dan kompleksitas tugas terhadap kinerja auditor pemerintah (Studi empiris pada Inspektorat Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta). https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/43231
[17] Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
[18] Rangkuti, F. (2016). Teknik membedah kasus bisnis analisis SWOT. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Saleh Siregar, F. (2022). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern pemerintah dan kompetensi sumber daya manusia terhadap kinerja (Studi kasus pada Kantor Inspektorat Kota Bandung). https://repository.usbypkp.ac.id/2645/1/COVER.pdf
[19] Sawyer, L. B., Dittenhofer, M. A., & Scheiner, J. H. (1996). Sawyer’s internal auditing: The practice of modern internal auditing. The Institute of Internal Auditors.
[20] Sugiyono. (2009). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
[21] Sukma, D. G. (2024). Pelaksanaan pengawasan internal pemerintah daerah oleh inspektorat dalam upaya mewujudkan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang baik (good governance) berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah. Dinamika Hukum. https://ejurnal.unisri.ac.id/index.php/Dinamika_Hukum/article/view/11117/5742
[22] United Nations Development Programme. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. UNDP.
Wafi, L. D. N. (2022). Penerapan perencanaan audit internal berbasis risiko di lingkungan Inspektorat Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. https://eprints.pknstan.ac.id/1736/4/05.%20Bab%20I_Lalu%20Dinu%20Nezaril%20Wafi_1302190801.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nanang Suryana, Hyronimus Rowa, Faria Ruhana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
