Implementation of a Teacher Performance Assessment System Based on the Ruang GTK Platform to Strengthen Teaching Staff Competence at SMPN 2 Karangrejo, Magetan Regency

Authors

  • Lutviana Department of Educational Management, Faculty of Education, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.567

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of a teacher performance assessment system using the GTK Room platform at SMPN 2 Karangrejo, Magetan, and its impact on strengthening teacher competence. The conventional evaluation system, being administrative, lacked feedback and integration with professional development, especially in semi-rural schools with limited training access. A quantitative survey was conducted with 28 respondents (25 teachers and 3 school leaders) using questionnaires, classroom observations, and platform documentation. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. Implementation satisfaction scored 8.3 out of 10. Pedagogic competence improved most substantially: 85.7% of teachers progressed in designing innovative, student-centered learning, with learning quality scores rising significantly by 23.4%. Digital literacy recorded the highest growth rate (92.9%), while professional competence and independent learning culture also strengthened significantly. Regression analysis showed principal support as the strongest success predictor (β=0.62), followed by technological infrastructure readiness (β=0.48) and teacher collaboration (β=0.41). Major obstacles—internet instability and digital literacy gaps between senior and junior teachers—require infrastructure strengthening and differentiated mentoring. In conclusion, shifting from administrative to digital platform-based assessment effectively promotes sustainable teacher professional development, even in resource-limited settings, provided there is visionary leadership and adequate mentoring support. These findings recommend accelerating digital teacher performance management in regions as a comprehensive, inclusive, and sustainable strategy for education quality equity, and they can serve as a replicable model of good practice for schools with similar characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] “Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen,” 2005, Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.

[2] L. Darling-Hammond, M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner, Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute, 2017.

[3] A. Wibowo, “Implementasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru Berbasis Teknologi Informasi: Studi Kasus di Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kabupaten Jawa Timur,” J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 112–128, 2021.

[4] Kemendikbudristek, “Panduan Penggunaan Platform Merdeka Mengajar dan Ruang GTK bagi Guru dan Kepala Sekolah,” Kemendikbudristek RI, Jakarta, 2021.

[5] Kemendikbudristek, “Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar: Transformasi Pendidikan Indonesia,” Pusat Layanan Pembiayaan Pendidikan, Jakarta, 2022.

[6] “Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Pedoman Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah,” 2019, Kemendikbud, Jakarta.

[7] “Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2017 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2008 tentang Guru,” 2017, Sekretariat Negara RI, Jakarta.

[8] W. Bank, “Transforming Indonesia’s Teaching Force: From Pre-service Training to Retirement,” World Bank Group, Jakarta, 2019.

[9] Supardi, Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.

[10] M. P. Gunawan, “Penerapan Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Guru Berbasis Online dalam Meningkatkan Profesionalisme Guru,” J. Inov. Pendidik., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 212–225, 2021.

[11] H. B. Uno, Profesi Kependidikan: Problema, Solusi, dan Reformasi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2012.

[12] E. T. Sulistiyani and S. M. Ferdinandez, “Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi dalam Penilaian Kinerja Guru,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 2020.

[13] K. P. Sari and N. H. Harahap, “Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Guru di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” J. Pendidik. Ekon. dan Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 135–147, 2019.

[14] E. Mulyasa, Uji Kompetensi dan Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Bandung: Rosda Karya, 2013.

[15] A. Rahman, “Peran Platform Digital dalam Mendukung Pengembangan Kompetensi Guru di Masa Pandemi COVID-19,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Sos., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 42–53, 2022.

[16] W. Bank, “Improving Teacher Quality in Indonesia: Moving Towards a Comprehensive and Coherent Policy Framework,” World Bank Group, Washington, DC, 2020.

[17] A. Rahman, “Digital Platforms for Teacher Professional Development in Rural Indonesia: Opportunities and Challenges,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 88, 2022.

[18] D. Satori and A. Komariah, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

[19] A. Zubair and H. Mustafa, “Pemanfaatan Platform Digital dalam Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru di Era New Normal,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2021.

[20] R. R. Aliyyah, A. Widyasari, and R. Mulyani, “Pengembangan Profesionalisme Guru melalui Pelatihan Berbasis Teknologi Informasi,” J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2019.

[21] H. Susanto, “Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dalam Mengimplementasikan Kurikulum 2013,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 489–503, 2014.

[22] E. T. Sulistiyani and S. M. Ferdinandez, “Digitalisasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru: Antara Efisiensi dan Akuntabilitas,” J. Adm. Pendidik., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 2020.

[23] H. Susanto, “Hubungan Kompetensi Pedagogik dengan Kemampuan Guru Mengelola Pembelajaran,” J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 134–142, 2015.

[24] S. N. Azizah and A. Ghufron, “Pengaruh Kompetensi Profesional Guru dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Prambanan,” J. Akuntabilitas Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 187–197, 2018.

[25] M. Yamin, Standarisasi Kinerja Guru. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Press, 2010.

[26] L. D. Prasojo, A. Habibi, M. F. Mohd Yaakob, and A. Mukminin, “Teachers’ Burnout: A SEM Analysis in an Asian Context,” Heliyon, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020.

[27] N. M. W. Wulandari, I. M. A. Santosa, and I. W. Widiana, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Berbantuan Google Classroom Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar IPA,” J. Pendidik. dan Pembelajaran IPA Indones., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2020.

[28] Y. Yusrizal, “Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dan Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Mutu Pendidikan di SMP Negeri Kabupaten Aceh Besar,” J. Adm. Pendidik. Pascasarj. Unsyiah, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2016.

[29] H. Fitria, “The Influence of Organizational Culture and Trust through the Teacher Performance in the Private Secondary School in Palembang,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 54–60, 2018.

[30] M. P. Gunawan, “Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dalam Mendorong Inovasi Penilaian Kinerja Guru,” J. Kepemimp. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 78–90, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Lutviana. (2026). Implementation of a Teacher Performance Assessment System Based on the Ruang GTK Platform to Strengthen Teaching Staff Competence at SMPN 2 Karangrejo, Magetan Regency . International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(2), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.567

Issue

Section

Articles