Evaluation of Budget Implementation Performance at The Domestic Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Home Affairs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.564Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the budget implementation performance at the Domestic Policy Strategy Agency (Badan Strategi Kebijakan Dalam Negeri/BSKDN), Ministry of Home Affairs. The background of this research is based on the importance of effective, efficient, and accountable state budget management as part of good governance. The Budget Implementation Performance Indicator (IKPA) is used as the main instrument to assess the quality of budget execution, covering planning, implementation, and outcome aspects. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach using the CIPP evaluation model (Context, Input, Process, Product) to obtain a comprehensive understanding of budget performance. Data were collected through document analysis, observation, and review of budget realization reports and IKPA achievements of BSKDN for the fiscal years 2022–2024. The results indicate that the budget implementation performance at BSKDN has improved over time, particularly in budget absorption, contractual spending, and output achievement, which have reached optimal levels. However, several indicators remain suboptimal, especially regarding revisions to DIPA Page III and the management of Cash Advances (UP) and Additional Cash Advances (TUP). Supporting factors include improved internal coordination, regulatory compliance, and better budget planning, while inhibiting factors involve dynamic planning changes and inefficiencies in operational cash management. This study recommends strengthening budget planning, enhancing financial management capacity, and optimizing internal control systems to improve IKPA scores sustainably. Therefore, budget implementation at BSKDN is expected to become more effective in supporting the achievement of organizational strategic goals and domestic governance policies.
Downloads
References
[1] Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Edisi revisi VII). PT Rineka Cipta.
[2] Best. (1959). Research in education AB. United States of America.
[3] Buana, L. C., & Widiatmoko, N. (2019). Pengaruh kepatuhan satker pada indikator kinerja pelaksanaan anggaran (IKPA) terhadap penyaluran dukungan anggaran Binopslat. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Krisnadwipayana, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.35137/jmbk.v7i3.352
[4] Centre for Science and Technology Studies. (2025). VOSviewer. VOSviewer
[5] Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
[6] Djaenuri, A. (2019). Konsep-konsep dasar pemerintah daerah. Universitas Terbuka.
[7] Dobell, P., & Ulrich, M. (2002). Parliament’s performance in the budget process: A case study.
[8] Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw-Hill.
[9] Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution. Praeger.
[10] Halim, A. (2007). Akuntansi sektor publik: Akuntansi keuangan daerah. Salemba Empat.
[11] Lasupu, E. Z., Kalangi, L., & Mawikere, L. M. (2021). Analisis efektivitas dan efisiensi pelaksanaan anggaran belanja pada Badan Kesatuan Bangsa dan Politik Kabupaten Tojo Una-Una. Jurnal EMBA, 9(3), 1433–1441.
[12] Mahmudi. (2010). Manajemen keuangan daerah. Erlangga.
[13] Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi sektor publik. Andi.
[14] Moeheriono. (2012). Pengukuran kinerja berbasis kompetensi. Grafindo Persada.
[15] Nazma, A. N. (2024). Evaluasi penyerapan anggaran sebagai indikator kinerja pelaksanaan anggaran (Studi kasus Balai Monitor Spektrum Frekuensi Radio Kelas I Bandung). Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen, Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan, 2(3), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.58192/wawasan.v2i3.2258
[16] Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 195/PMK.05/2018 tentang Monitoring dan Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Anggaran Belanja Kementerian/Lembaga.
[17] Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor PER-5/PB/2024 tentang Petunjuk Teknik Penilaian Indikator Kinerja Pelaksanaan Anggaran Belanja Kementerian Negara/Lembaga.
[18] Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 1995/PMK.05/2018 tentang Indikator Kinerja Pelaksanaan Anggaran.
[19] Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 12 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.
[20] Riduwan, & Akdon. (2010). Rumus dan data dalam analisis statistika (Cetakan ke-2). Alfabeta.
[21] Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2011). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.
[22] Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2009). Dasar-dasar penelitian kualitatif: Tata langkah dan teknik-teknik teoritisasi data. Pustaka Pelajar.
[23] Stufflebeam, D. L. (1971). The relevance of the CIPP evaluation model for educational accountability. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of School Administrators, Atlantic City, NJ.
[24] Subagyo, P. J. (2011). Metodologi penelitian dalam teori dan praktik. Rineka Cipta.
[25] Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
[26] Sundari, M. E. (2015). Pengaruh asimetri informasi, penekanan anggaran, komitmen.
[27] Supriyati. (2011). Metodologi penelitian. Labkat Press.
[28] Syafiie, I. K. (2003). Ilmu pemerintahan (Edisi revisi). Mandar Maju.
[29] Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara.
[30] Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
[31] Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction (7th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
[32] Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford Press.
[33] Peraturan BPK RI PMK No. 62 Tahun 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Stella Anastasia Wuka, Khasan Effendy, Ika Sartika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
