Analysis of Violations of the Indonesian Engineers Code of Ethics (PII) and Systemic Failures in the Hambalang P3son Project Case Study

Authors

  • Dicky Prima Alexander Manurung Faculty of Engineering Unimed, Medan, Indonesia
  • Eka Daryanto Faculty of Engineering Unimed, Medan, Indonesia
  • Syafiatun Siregar Faculty of Engineering Unimed, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.559

Abstract

This study aims to examine in depth the implementation and violations of the engineering code of ethics in the Hambalang National Education, Training, and Sports School (P3SON) Project. The Hambalang Project, which experienced structural failure due to neglect of geotechnical engineering principles and political collusion, is used as a case study of systemic failure. The analysis focuses on violations of the Sapta Dharma of the Indonesian Engineers Association (PII) and the evaluation of professional responsibility based on ethical theories (Deontology, Teleology, and Virtue Ethics). The analysis results indicate that ethical violations, especially conflicts of interest and systemic corruption, are the main causes that trigger technical violations (ignoring the risks of expansive clay soil). The identified fundamental violations are Sapta Dharma Point 1 (Prioritizing Public Safety), Point 2 (Working According to Competence), and Point 4 (Avoiding Conflicts of Interest). Recommendations proposed include systemic solutions such as the separation of critical contracts and mandatory independent design validation (peer review) to strengthen the culture of engineering ethics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI). (2013). Audit Report on the Hambalang P3SON Project for the 2010-2012 Fiscal Year. Jakarta: BPK RI.

[2]. Johnson, A. (2022). Distributed Responsibility in Large-Scale Engineering Projects: Ethical Challenges and Legal Implications. Journal of Professional Engineering Ethics, 20(4), 112-130.

[3]. Kompas. (2013, August 29). BPK Audit: State Losses in the Hambalang Project Reach Rp 706 Billion. Kompas.com.

[4]. Perkasa, R., & Susilo, BH (2021). From Compliance to Integrity: A Paradigm Shift in Indonesian Engineering Ethics Education. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(2), 1-15.

[5]. Indonesian Engineers Association (PII). (nd). Indonesian Engineers Code of Ethics: Catur Karsa and Sapta Dharma. Retrieved November 10, 2025, fromhttps://pii.or.id/resources/kode-etik.

[6]. Sidharta, A. (2018). Study of Building Structure Failure Analysis in Indonesia from a Geotechnical Aspect (Case Study: Hambalang Project). Journal of Civil Engineering, 14(2), 89-102.

[7]. Tempo. (2012, July 1). The Hambalang Hill Project Collapses. Tempo Investigative Magazine. Retrieved November 10, 2025, fromhttps://majalah.tempo.co/read/investigasi/140651/amblesnya-proyek-di-bukit-hambalang.

[8]. Wang, Q. (2020). Ethical Dilemmas in Geotechnical Engineering: When Cost Pressure Meets Ground Risk. Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 45(1), 50-65.

[9]. Yuan, Z., Lin, Y., & Tan, X. (2023). The Causal Relationship between Poor Project Governance and Technical Failure in Megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(5), 04023021.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

How to Cite

Dicky Prima Alexander Manurung, Eka Daryanto, & Syafiatun Siregar. (2026). Analysis of Violations of the Indonesian Engineers Code of Ethics (PII) and Systemic Failures in the Hambalang P3son Project Case Study. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(2), 690–693. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i2.559

Issue

Section

Articles