Eco-Jurisprudence on Deforestation-Induced Disasters: Establishing a Legal Nexus Between Forest Clearance and Environmental Crimes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.407Abstract
The escalating frequency of deforestation-induced disasters in the Anthropocene has exposed a significant gap in global ecological governance, where scientific causality often fails to translate into judicial liability. This research explores the integration of eco-jurisprudence and forensic ecology to establish a robust legal nexus between forest clearance and environmental crimes. Using a normative juridical methodology supported by a comparative legal approach, the study analyzes how hydrological modeling and spatial data can be transformed into admissible legal evidence. The results demonstrate that by utilizing the "Causality-Nexus Protocol," the judiciary can apply the doctrine of strict liability for environmental negligence, bypassing the traditional hurdles of proving subjective intent (mens rea). By citing international human rights standards and recent advancements in attribution science (2021–2025), the study argues that catastrophic floods and landslides resulting from canopy loss constitute a violation of the non-derogable right to life. The novelty of this research lies in the conceptualization of the ecosystem as a "silent witness," providing a standardized framework for "Scientific Jurisprudence." This paper concludes that establishing a definitive legal nexus is essential for shifting environmental law from reactive administrative oversight to proactive criminal accountability, thereby strengthening global ecological governance.
Downloads
References
[1] Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., & Rajamani, L. (2023). International Climate Change Law: New Frontiers in Attribution and Liability. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192852831.001.0001
[2] Boyd, D. R. (2023). The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution for a Sustainable Future. ECW Press.
[3] Caney, S. (2022). Climate Change, Human Rights, and Moral Responsibility. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 39(5), 811-829. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12612
[4] Favero, A., Daigneault, A., & Sohngen, B. (2022). Forests: A Global Carbon Sink or Source? The Role of Management and Policy in Climate Mitigation. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 16(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1086/721005
[5] Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Gregor, L., Hauck, J., ... & Zheng, B. (2023). Global Carbon Budget 2023. Earth System Science Data, 15(12), 5301-5369. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023
[6] Grear, A., & Grant, E. (2024). Non-Human Testimony: The Role of Ecological Data as Evidence in Global Climate Litigation. Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, 15(1), 12-34.
[7] Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2021). Advisory Opinion OC-23/17: Environment and Human Rights. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_23_ing.pdf
[8] IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
[9] Kotzé, L. J. (2024). Ecological Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene: Reimagining the Rule of Law for a Broken Planet. Journal of Environmental Law, 36(2), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqae002
[10] Lin, J., & Kysar, D. A. (2021). Climate Change Litigation: Adjudicating the Future. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17, 343-363. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-111020-101453
[11] Sinnar, S. (2023). The Case for Environmental Justice as a Non-Derogable Right under International Law. Stanford Law Review, 75(3), 601-670.
[12] Setzer, J., & Higham, C. (2022). Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2022 Snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science.
[13] Steffen, W., et al. (2021). The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2, 44-61.
[14] Stop Ecocide International. (2021). Independent Expert Panel for the Legal Definition of Ecocide: Commentary and Core Text. https://www.stopecocide.earth/legal-definition
[15] United Nations General Assembly. (2022). Resolution 76/300: The human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. A/RES/76/300.
[16] Vicedo-Cabrera, A. M., Scovronick, N., Sera, F., Royé, D., Schneider, R., Tobias, A., ... & Gasparrini, A. (2021). The burden of anthropogenic climate change on heat-related mortality. Nature Climate Change, 11(6), 492-500. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01058-x
[17] Wang, Z., Sun, H., & Liu, Y. (2024). Deep Learning in Hydrological Forecasting: A Review of Applications and Legal Implications for Disaster Liability. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 118-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118542
[18] White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2022). Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm (3rd ed.). Routledge.
[19] World Bank. (2023). Forests and Climate Change: Regional Legal Frameworks for Decarbonization. World Bank Publications.
[20] Zahar, A. (2021). Climate Change Law. Hart Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Emirza Henderlan Harahap
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
