Obstruction of Justice Against Advocates in Indonesian Corruption Cases: Implications of Article 21 for Professional Independence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.405Abstract
The offense of obstruction of justice (OJ) functions to safeguard the integrity of the administration of justice from acts that intentionally interfere with law enforcement processes. In the context of corruption eradication in Indonesia, the regulation of OJ under Article 21 of the Anti-Corruption Law is designed as a protective instrument for the judicial system. However, the elastic formulation of the norm—particularly the phrase “directly or indirectly”—creates significant legal problems when applied to advocates, who are doctrinally positioned as independent officers of the court. This article examines the boundary between legitimate adversarial defense and obstruction of justice committed by advocates in the legal representation of corruption cases by analyzing the structure of the offense, the relationship between actus reus and mens rea, and its implications for professional independence and the principle of fair trial. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and doctrinal approaches, supported by national and international literature review. The findings demonstrate that the lack of precision in defining the elements of conduct, causality, and the threshold of intent in Article 21 of the Anti-Corruption Law has the potential to obscure the boundary between lawful defense actions and criminal obstruction, thereby increasing the risk of overcriminalization and creating a chilling effect on advocacy practices. This article proposes a framework for normative reform through rule-sharpening and role-based screening liability approaches to ensure that the criminalization of obstruction of justice continues to function as a safeguard for the judicial system without undermining the independence of the legal profession and the right to effective legal representation.
Downloads
References
[1] E. S. Podgor, “Obstruction of Justice: Redesigning the Shortcu,” Brigh. Young Univ. Law Rev., vol. 46, no. 46, p. 657, 2021.
[2] D. S. Ramdhani and A. Adhari, “Construction of Criminal Liability in Single Indictment of Obstruction of Justice under the Corruption Law,” J. Ilmu Huk. Kyadiren, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1163–1180, 2026, doi: 10.46924/jihk.v7i2.380.
[3] D. I. Bhayangkara, Fatahillah, and B. Bahreisy, “OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICEOLEH ADVOKAT TERHADAP PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI,” J. Ilm. Mhs., vol. VII, no. 4, pp. 1–16, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/jimfh/.
[4] N. Sitorus and A. Arfa’i, “Analisis Pengaturan Kewenangan Advokat Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003,” Limbago J. Const. Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 199–213, 2023, doi: 10.22437/limbago.v3i2.20732.
[5] Arfiani, S. Syofyan, and S. Delyarahmi, “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Delik Obstruction of Justice Dalam Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” UNES J. Swara Justisia, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 516, 2023, doi: 10.31933/ujsj.v6i4.294.
[6] M. Rahul Fauzan Saragih, B. Jaya Negara Pohan, and T. Marlina Tarigan, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Advokat pada Obstruction Of Justice Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” J. Bimbing. Konseling, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 891–901, 2020, doi: 10.47476/assyari.v5i3.3027.
[7] P. M. Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
[8] J. Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia, 2012.
[9] C. Boys, “Obstruction of Justice: an Overview of Some of the Federal Statutes that Prohibit Interference with Judicial, Executive, or Legislative Activities.,” Washington DC, 2007.
[10] J. F. Decker, “The varying parameters of obstruction of justice in American criminal law,” LA. Law Rev., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 49–130, 2004.
[11] D. C. England, “Obstruction of Justice,” www.criminaldefenselawyer.com, 2010. https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/resources/criminal-defense/crime-penalties/what-criminal-obstruction-what-penalties (accessed Nov. 22, 2025).
[12] M. A. Jalil, “Pengaturan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku yang Menghalangi Proses Peradilan (Obstruction of Justice) Dikaji Dari Perspektif Hukum Pidana dan Kepastian Hukum,” J. Glob. Ilm., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1210–1220, 2025.
[13] I. A. Majeed, “The crime of obstructing justice in national legislations and international conventions,” Int. J. Civ. Law Leg. Res., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2025, doi: 10.22271/civillaw.2025.v5.i1a.119.
[14] P. Yudi and H. A. Simanjuntak, “Interpretation of obstruction of justice in the crime of corruption in law number 31 year 1999,” Int. J. Polit. Sociol. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 50–55, 2023.
[15] A. Dimas, M. Hasrul, and H. A. Mirzana, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Advokat Atas Interpretasi Obstruction of Justice,” J. Huk. dan Kenotariatan, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 308, 2021, doi: 10.33474/hukeno.v5i2.10901.
[16] Y. Afifah and D. Yuslita Julianis, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Obstruction of Justice dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual,” J. Lex Renaiss., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 91–112, 2023, doi: 10.20885/jlr.vol8.iss1.art6.
[17] R. Arifin, R. Alkadri, R. B. Smith, N. N. Smith, and W. Wahyudin, “Indonesia’s New Penal Code: Harmonizing with Global Justice or Defying International Norms?,” Lex Sci. Law Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 561–594, 2024, doi: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14271.
[18] J. D. Junianto, “Obstruction of Justice dalam Pasal 21 Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Media Iuris, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 335, 2020, doi: 10.20473/mi.v2i3.15208.
[19] M. F. H. Niode, F. Farhana, and D. S. Dewi, “Penerapan Prinsip Hak Imunitas Advokat Atas Interpretasi Obstrucstion of Justice Dalam Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia.,” SENTRI J. Ris. Ilm., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 644–656, 2024, doi: 10.55681/sentri.v3i2.2304.
[20] F. F. Jodi, “Pemberatan Pidana Bagi Pelaku Obstruction Of Justice Dalam Upaya Memberikan Dampak Positif Kinerja Penegak Hukum,” J. Litigasi, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 110–123, 2024, doi: 10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.10389.
[21] M. O. Akimov, L. A. Ostafiichuk, O. V. Goncharuk, A. O. Shulha, and D. A. Tretiakov, “Criminal liability for obstructing the legal activity of a defense counsel in court proceedings,” Rev. Amaz. Investig., vol. 11, no. 50, pp. 79–88, 2022, doi: 10.34069/ai/2022.50.02.8.
[22] F. Lubis and M. I. Nasution, “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ADVOCATE IMMUNITY RIGHTS IN THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE,” RGSA – Rev. Gestão Soc. e Ambient., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-103.
[23] A. Ashworth and J. Horder, Principles of Criminal Law. OUP Oxford, 2013.
[24] E. Aryani, A. Jumiati, and N. S. Pamungkas, “Criminal Responsibility of the Perpetrator of Obstruction of Justice in Corruption Crimes,” Indones. J. Law Justice, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 11, 2025, doi: 10.47134/ijlj.v2i4.4063.
[25] I. M. M. Widyantara, A. S. L. Dewi, and K. A. Wirawan, “Imposing Criminal Sanctions on Perpetrators Who Obstruct the Investigation (Obstraction of Justice),” in Changing of Law: Business Law, Local Wisdom and Tourism Industry” (ICCLB 2023), 2023, no. 3, pp. 698–708, doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-180-7_75.
[26] J. Broulík, “FACTUAL PREDICTABILITY IN COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT: RULES VERSUS STANDARDS,” Amsterdam, 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4773206.
[27] M. A. Suryadi and M. Zainal, “Analisis Perbuatan Menghalangi Proses Penyidikan, Penuntutan dan Peradilan (Obstruction of Justice) dalam Sistem Pidana di Indonesia,” Justness J. Huk. Polit. dan Agama, vol. 3, no. 2, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.stihzainulhasan.ac.id/index.php/justness/article/view/46.
[28] Antoni and M. Barthos, “Ambiguity of the Offense Regarding Obstruction of Justice in Indonesia,” J. Syntax IDEA, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 6703–6715, 2024.
[29] L. A. A. Tangko, D. Agung, and Andi Dewi Pratiwi, “Penerapan Hukum terhadap Pelaku dan Korban Tindak pidana Obstruction of Justice,” Alauddin Law Dev. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 274–282, 2023, doi: 10.24252/aldev.v5i2.35685.
[30] Juniar Sidiki, N. M. Kasim, and F. Amrain, “Hak Imunitas Advokat dan Prinsip Equality Before the Law: Telaah Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Positif dalam Kasus Obstruction of Justice,” Arus J. Sos. dan Hum., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 808–817, 2025, doi: 10.57250/ajsh.v5i1.1130.
[31] L. R. Eno and Y. A. Napitupulu, “Hak Imunitas Advokat pada Perbuatan Menghalangi Proses Peradilan ( Obstruction of Justice ) Terhadap Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” PESHUM J. Pendidikan, Sos. dan Hum., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2001–2009, 2025.
[32] O. G. Andini, L. A. Gusreyna, R. Erawaty, and S. Eriansyah, “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Delik Obstruction of Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Alauddin Law Dev. J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 533–560, 2023, doi: 10.24252/aldev.v5i3.37894.
[33] R. Moorhead, “Precarious professionalism: Some empirical and behavioural perspectives on lawyers,” Curr. Leg. Probl., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 447–481, 2014, doi: 10.1093/clp/cuu004.
[34] C. Huda, R. Yulia, M. Romdoni, Y. Saefudin, and N. Ismail, “Reassessing Functional Differentiation and Dominus Litis under Indonesia’s New Criminal Procedure Code,” Jambe Law J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 475–515, 2025, doi: 10.22437/jlj.8.2.475-515.
[35] A. Syaifudin, S. Abadi, and A. U. Wijaya, “Advocate Criminal Liability Without Advocate Code of Ethics Examination Mechanism,” J. Magister Huk. “Law Humanit., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 153–174, 2023, doi: 10.37504/lh.v1i2.548.
[36] S. Mertokusumo, Penemuan Hukum: Sebuah Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1993.
[37] E. O. Hiariej, Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2016.
[38] E. Colvin, “Causation in Criminal Law,” Bond Law Rev., vol. 1, no. 2, 1989, doi: 10.53300/001c.5193.
[39] M. Moore, “Causation in the Law,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 202., E. N. Zalta and U. Nodelman, Eds. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, 2024.
[40] F. Schauer, “Ruleness,” 2020. doi: 10.4324/9781003046776-2.
[41] R. A. Duff, “Responsibility and Liability in Criminal Law,” in The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart: Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy, Oxford University Press, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Made Suardana, Sagung Putri M.E Purwani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
