Development of A Time and Cost Control System For The Construction of A Ø1000 Mm Pipe Bridge Based on A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Integrated With A 3d Model and Bim to Improve Time and Cost Performance

Authors

  • Ulya Ilmi Azhara Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia
  • Leni Sagita Riantini Supriadi Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia
  • Yusuf Latief Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.399

Abstract

The construction of large-diameter pipeline bridges plays a strategic role in ensuring the reliability of clean water distribution systems. Nevertheless, such infrastructure projects frequently experience cost overruns and schedule deviations caused by fragmented scope definition, limited integration between planning and cost control, and conventional quantity take-off practices that rely heavily on two-dimensional drawings. These limitations reduce the effectiveness of project monitoring and delay corrective decision-making during construction. This study develops an integrated time and cost control system by embedding a standardized Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) into a 3D and 5D Building Information Modeling (BIM) environment for a Ø1000 mm pipeline bridge project. A mixed-method research approach was adopted, combining expert validation, project document analysis, and quantitative assessment. Project performance was evaluated using Earned Value Management (EVM), while Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was applied to examine the causal relationships between WBS integration, 3D modeling, BIM implementation, the time and cost control system, and schedule and cost performance. The results demonstrate that BIM-derived quantities and costs are more consistent and traceable than those obtained from conventional Bill of Quantities (BOQ) calculations, particularly for steel structural and support components that exhibit the highest cost deviations. The integration of WBS with BIM 3D and BIM 5D significantly strengthens activity-level monitoring, improves cost control accuracy, and enables earlier detection of schedule and cost deviations. The proposed framework provides practical decision support for proactive time and cost management in infrastructure construction projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Saputra, H., & Latief, Y. (2020). Integrating WBS with safety and cost aspects to enhance owner estimate reliability. Journal of Civil Engineering Forum, 6(2), 187–196.

[2] Abanda, F. H., & Byers, L. (2016). An investigation of the impact of Building Information Modeling on project information management. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 422–437.

[3] Amirilaskar, E., Ervitte, R., & Sari, D. P. (2023). Comparative study of cost estimation methods in construction procurement: Data inquiry vs. cost structure. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(6).

[4] Succar, B. (2009). Building information Modeling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction, 18(3), 357–375.

[5] Wong, J. K. W., & Zhou, J. (2015). Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM. Automation in Construction, 57, 156–165.

[6] Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.

[7] Love, P. E. D., Edwards, D. J., & Irani, Z. (2012). Moving beyond optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation. Construction Management and Economics, 30(6), 469–483.

[8] Gebrehiwet, T., & Luo, H. (2017). Analysis of delay impact on construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(6).

[9] Kim, K., Cho, Y., & Zhang, S. (2016). Integrating BIM with Earned Value Management for effective project control. Automation in Construction, 68, 1–15.

[10] Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

[11] Astana, I. N. Y., Wiryasa, N. A., & Pinakesty, S. A. P. (2023). The relationship below 80% of the owner estimate price on construction projects to project performance. Journal of Asian Multicultural Research for Economy and Management Study.

[12] AACE International. (2020). Cost estimate classification system – As applied in engineering, procurement, and construction for the process industries (No. 56R-08). Morgantown, WV: AACE International.

[13] Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2018). BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

[14] PMI. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.

[15] Abdel-Hamid, M., & Abdelhaleem, M. (2019). BIM-based cost control for infrastructure projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(10), 2345–2363.

[16] Hartmann, T., van Meerveld, H., Vossebeld, N., & Adriaanse, A. (2012). Aligning building information model tools and construction management methods. Automation in Construction, 22, 605–613.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-05

How to Cite

Ilmi Azhara, U., Sagita Riantini Supriadi, L., & Latief, Y. (2026). Development of A Time and Cost Control System For The Construction of A Ø1000 Mm Pipe Bridge Based on A Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Integrated With A 3d Model and Bim to Improve Time and Cost Performance. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(1), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.399