Beyond Hierarchy: A Systematic Review of Organizational Transformation Through Agile, Network and Platform-Based Models

Authors

  • Munawaroh Munawaroh Master of Management Program, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Dewi Irianti Master of Management Program, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Fanny Satya Utama Master of Management Program, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Herdiansyah Herdiansyah Master of Management Program, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia
  • Siti Saroh Master of Management Program, Universitas Bina Bangsa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.375

Abstract

Traditional hierarchical organizations prove increasingly inadequate confronting volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments necessitating radical structural transformation toward agile, network, and platform-based models.This systematic literature review synthesizes empirical evidence examining transformation pathways, implementation challenges, and performance outcomes across these three organizational archetypes. Following rigorous review protocols, comprehensive search across academic databases yielded 24 peer-reviewed publications (2015-2025) subjected to thematic analysis.Findings reveal three critical themes: agile principles enabling rapid adaptation through iterative processes and self-organizing teams, network structures facilitating cross-boundary collaboration through decentralized decision-making, and platform ecosystems leveraging digital infrastructure for value co-creation.Literature demonstrates significant gap regarding systematic integration frameworks connecting these complementary models organizations typically adopt piecemeal approaches missing synergistic potential. Research contributes novel Agile-Network-Platform (ANP) Integration Framework proposing three-layer architecture: operational agility (team level),network coordination (organizational level), and platform orchestration (ecosystem level).Organizations should implement parallel transformation addressing team empowerment, structural flattening, and digital platform development creating adaptive organizational systems balancing flexibility, collaboration, and scalability. Study limitations include literature review methodology and emphasis on technology-intensive industries suggesting comparative research across sectors and longitudinal implementations examining ANP framework effectiveness over transformation journeys.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Adhikersa, R., Kumorotomo, W., Djunaedi, A., & Hadna, A. H. (2022). Impact of agile organization and leadership on employee experience. Populasi, 30(2), 103–125.

[2] Astuti,D.Djati,S.P.,& Santosa,W(2023).The effect of agile leadership, organizational culture and dynamic capabilities on organization agility.International Journal of Economics Development Research,4, 2805–2820.

[3] Beck, K., et al. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. Agile Alliance.

[4] Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA really means for you. Harvard Business Review, 92(1/2), 27.

[5] Boudreau, K. J., & Hagiu, A. (2009). Platform rules: Multi-sided platforms as regulators. In Platforms, Markets and Innovation (pp. 163–191). Edward Elgar.

[6] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

[7] Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W. W. Norton.

[8] Davenport, T. H.(2018).The AI Advantage:How to Put the Artificial Intelligence Revolution to Work.MIT Press.

[9] Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. MIT Press.

[10] Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249.

[11] Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.

[12] Kaplan, R. S., & Mikes, A. (2012). Managing risks: A new framework. Harvard Business Review, 90(6), 48–60.

[13] Koning, P. (2019). Agile Leadership Toolkit: Learning to Thrive with Self-Managing Teams. Addison-Wesley.

[14] McKinsey & Company. (2017). The 5 Trademarks of Agile Organizations.

[15] Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy. W. W. Norton.

[16] Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. Free Press.

[17] Porter, M. E., & Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64–88.

[18] Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.

[19] Putrianasari, R., Budiardjo, E. K., Mahatma, K., & Raharjo, T. (2024). Problems in the adoption of agile-scrum software development process. Sinkron: Jurnal dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(1), 495–504.

[20] Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2016). Embracing agile. Harvard Business Review, 94(5), 40–50.

[21] Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

[22] Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

[23] Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press.

[24] Worley, C. G., & Lawler III, E. E. (2010). Agility and organization design. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 194–206.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

How to Cite

Munawaroh, M., Irianti, D., Satya Utama, F., Herdiansyah, H., & Saroh, S. (2026). Beyond Hierarchy: A Systematic Review of Organizational Transformation Through Agile, Network and Platform-Based Models. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(1), 584–591. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.375