Strategy Of The Gemaharjo Village Government In Maintaining The Existence Of Independent Villages From 2020 To 2025 In Pacitan Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.364Abstract
This study aims to analyze the strategy of the Gemaharjo Village government in maintaining the existence of an independent village from 2020 to 2025 in Pacitan Regency. The study discusses the transformation of Gemaharjo Village into an independent village, the flagship programs of the independent village, the implantation of government strategies in sustaining village independence, and the government’s efforts to maintain the existence of the independent village. This research employs a qualitative approach to explore and gain an in-depth understanding of data from a group of individuals. Data were collected trough in-depth interviews, data analysis, and documentacion. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling, selecting informants in this study consisted of the Head of Gemaharjo Village, the Village Secretary, and the Head of Village Planning Affairs. The result indicate that Gemaharjo Village has successfully achieved and maintained its status as an independent village through the fulfillment of the Developing Village Index (Indeks Desa Membangun/IDM) indicators, supported by adequated village facilities and the strengthening of economic, educational, health, agricultural, and livestock sectors. This independence is further reinforced by the development of leading sectors based on local potential, particulary dairy cattle farming through collaboration with Nestlé as well as the innovation of local products such as Raja Subali, which serves as the village’s distinctive identity. The success of Gemaharjo Village is also supported by intregrated village government startegies, policy consistency, accountable governance, and active community participation, enabling the sustainability of development and the long-term maintenance of village independence.
Downloads
References
[1] Presiden, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Desa, no. 1. 2014.
[2] Menteri, Keputusan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 105 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pemberian Penghargaan Desa Dengan Status Mandiri. 2022, pp. 1–487.
[3] A. N. Astika and N. S. Subawa, “Evaluasi Pembangunan Desa Berdasarkan Indeks Desa Membangun,” J. Ilm. Muqoddimah J. Ilmu Sos. Polit. dan Hum., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 223–232, 2021.
[4] T. Budiarto, E. Rustiadi, and A. H. Dharmawan, “Perkembangan dan Kemandirian Desa di Kabupaten Bogor, Provinsi Jawa Barat,” Tata Loka, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 230 – 241, 2017.
[5] Asbeni, “Strategi Pengembangan Ekonomi desa Menuju Desa Mandiri,” PATANI, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 39–45, 2020.
[6] B. Widiyahseno, “Inovasi Bupati di Ruang Demokrasi : Upaya Membangun Kesadaran Inovasi Birokrasi,” Membangun Kesadaran Inov. BirokrasiJurnal Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 177–195, 2015.
[7] Ardiansyah, Risnita, and M. S. Jailani, “Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan Pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif,” IHSAN J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2023.
[8] J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran, 5th ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2016.
[9] E. Babbie, The Basics of Social Research. 2014.
[10] M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications, 2014.
[11] N. K. Denzin, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
[12] A. Hakim, K. Muluk, and A. Haris, “Self-sufficient Villages : A Systematic Literature Review,” EDUL Eur. Union Digit. Libr., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1 – 10, 2025, doi: 10.4108/eai.30-10-2024.2354723.
[13] J. A. Urumi, I. Setiawan, U. Terbuka, and P. Cabe, “Transformasi Desa Menuju Kemandirian : Studi Pemanfaatan Dana Desa Berbasis IDM Di Kecamatan Bone , Bone Bolango Author : Affiliation : Universitas Terbuka,” JEKP (Jurnal Ekon. dan Keuang. Publik), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1 – 15, 2025.
[14] T. P. Nugrahanti, L. Lanjarsih, and P. Ratna, “Pemberdayaan Desa Menuju Desa Mandiri dan Berkelanjutan Melalui Pendampingan Sistem Keuangan,” J. Hum. Educ., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 475 – 484, 2025.
[15] K. Budiarta et al., “Transformasi Desa Nyitdah Menuju Mandiri Digital dengan Literasi Digital pada Masyarakat,” ADMA J. Pengabdi. dan Pemberdaya. Masy., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 9 – 20, 2025, doi: 10.30812/adma.v6i1.4857.
[16] I. Mentayani, B. N. Muchamad, M. I. Saud, and N. Aufa, “Penyusunan Masterplan Desa Berbasis Mandiri-Wisata pada Desa Batulicin Irigasi , Kalimantan Selatan,” ILUNG J. Pengabdi. Inov. Lahan Basah Unggul, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.20527/ilung.v1i2.
[17] Fatmawati, L. Hakim, and Mappamiring, “Pembangunan Desa Mandiri Melalui Partisipasi Mayarakat di Kecamatan Pattallassang Kabupaten Gowa,” J. Public Policy Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 15 – 21, 2020.
[18] A. Sarjito, “Community-Based Development Model in The Village Independent Program : A Case Study,” J. Politk Pemerintah. Dharma Praja, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 23 – 41, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.33701/jppdp.v18i1.5278 COMMUNITY-BASED.
[19] Y. Herawan, R. Mulyawan, and D. Yunita, “Perencanaaan Pembangunan Berbasis IDM (Indeks Desa Membangun) Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Kemandirian Masyarakat di Kabupaten Ciamis Tahum 2020,” J. Adm. Pemerintah., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 378–389, 2023.
[20] H. Abdul, “Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pembangunan desa,” 2024.
[21] N. Handini, M. Darwina, Yudistira, and W. Pangestoeti, “Peran pemerintah daerah dalam mengoptimalkan potensi ekonomi lokal melalui inovasi kebijakan pembangunan berkelanjutan,” vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 964–986, 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Larasati Kansa Widya Putri, Ekapti Wahjuni Djuwitaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
