The Urgency of Establishing AI Regulations to Ensure Legal Certainty and AI Ethics in Responding to Challenges Digitalization in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.353Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in Indonesia has had a significant impact on various aspects of life, including the legal realm and the protection of individual rights. Phenomena such as deepfakes and generative AI, as seen in the case of the "Polaroid Gemini AI Trend," demonstrate the weak legal protection of privacy and personal image due to the absence of regulations specifically governing the use and responsibilities for AI. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a literature review and descriptive-analytical analysis method to assess the effectiveness of current regulations, such as the ITE Law and the PDP Law, and examines the urgency of establishing specific regulations regarding artificial intelligence. The results show that both laws are unable to accommodate the complexity of AI, particularly regarding legal accountability for automatically generated digital content. Therefore, the establishment of specific regulations based on Luciano Floridi's digital ethics theory and UNESCO's AI Ethics, which emphasize the principles of transparency, justice, accountability, and respect for human rights, is needed. These regulations are expected to create adaptive legal certainty and realize ethical, equitable, and sustainable AI governance in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
[1] Amalia, E. Y., Isnawati, M., & Protection, L. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban tindak pidana penipuan transaksi jual beli pada marketplace.
[2] Budhijanto, D. (2025). Hukum cyber crime 4.0: Kejahatan digital dan artificial intelligence (AI). Gramedia.
[3] Farizy, S. A. (2024). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen dalam kasus penipuan transaksi e-commerce. https://doi.org/10.35706/positum.v9i2.13002
[4] Herrenauw, J. M., Alfaromona, J., Titahelu, S., & Saimima, J. M. (2022). Kajian hukum pidana dalam penipuan jual beli akun permainan online melalui media sosial. Jurnal, 2(3), 252–261.
[5] Keputusan Bersama Menteri Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, dan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. (2021). Keputusan Bersama Nomor 229 Tahun 2021, Nomor 154 Tahun 2021, Nomor KB/2/VI/2021 (pp. 1–22).
[6] Mubarak. (2023). Faktor yang berhubungan dengan penanganan tindak pidana. Jurnal, 1(1), 19–24.
[7] Mustikajati, A. A., Jalan, A., Sutami, I., & Tengah, J. (2024). Penipuan sebagai benda orang lain yang diatur dalam Pasal 378 KUHP. Jurnal, 1(2).
[8] Pakina, R. (2023). Electronic Information and Transactions Law and business development in Indonesia: Confrontational or accommodative? Komitmen: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 4(1), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.15575/jim.v4i1.23996
[9] Pratama, R. M., Widyasari, W., & Nisa, D. A. (2022). Pencegahan penipuan dalam transaksi jual-beli game online dengan media animasi. Jurnal Imajinasi, 6(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.26858/i.v6i1.32861
[10] Ramli, A. M., Ramli, T. S., & C., F. G. (2025). Hukum telematika (Edisi ke-3). Universitas Terbuka. https://pustaka.ut.ac.id/lib/hkum4301-hukum-telematika-edisi-3/
[11] Solikin, N. (2021). Pengantar metodologi penelitian hukum. https://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/12273/
[12] Sjahputra, I. (2021). Perlindungan konsumen dalam transaksi elektronik: Ditinjau dari perspektif hukum perlindungan konsumen dan hukum siber. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Perlindungan_konsumen_dalam_transaksi_el.html
[13] Ummah, M. S. (2019). Pengantar hukum siber.
[14] Vebri, T., Setiawan, A., & Khairunissa, A. (2025). Perlindungan data pribadi dalam teknologi AI: Analisis peran hukum dan kepatuhan regulasi bisnis digital. Jurnal, 14(2), 191–207.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kamelia Hana Santoso, Kamelia Hana Santoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
