Legal Validity of Smart Contracts as a Digital Contract Mechanism in Online Buying and Selling Transactions (E-Commerce) on the Opensea Application

Authors

  • Muhamad Lutfi Asan Esa Unggul
  • Rizka Amelia Azis Faculty of Law, Esa Unggul University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.351

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has revolutionized conventional contract practices toward decentralized and transparent digital contracts. This phenomenon has given rise to new forms of contracting, such as smart contracts. Smart contracts are digital contracts designed to facilitate automatic (self-executing) contract execution. This research focuses on the legal validity of smart contracts as a digital contract mechanism in online (e-commerce) transactions, as well as the legal liability of the parties arising from their automated execution. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a statute approach, case approach, and analytical approach by analyzing in depth Article 1320 of the Civil Code, Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, the second amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning Electronic System Administration and Transactions, Government Regulation Number 80 of 2019 concerning Trade Through Electronic Systems, regarding the requirements for the validity of an agreement, by highlighting the implementation of smart contracts, especially the issue of the competence of the smart contract system. The results of the study show that smart contracts can be implemented technically, but legally based on the requirements for the validity of an agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, smart contracts do not meet the requirements for the validity of an agreement and cannot be implemented perfectly in smart contract agreements and the legal responsibilities of the parties can still be applied in accordance with applicable regulations. Therefore, this study confirms that current smart contract regulations still have a legal vacuum and only rely on conventional legal frameworks such as Article 1320 The Civil Code and Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions serve as the primary legal basis for smart contracts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Aldan Syaifullah Alulu, W. A. Dungga, & Z. Abdussamad. (2024). Akibat hukum yang ditimbulkan terhadap perjanjian keabsahan hukum pada perjanjian jual beli elektronik yang dilakukan anak di bawah umur menurut hukum kontrak dan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(4), 129–130. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i4.289

[2] Amajihono, K. D. (2022). Kekuatan hukum kontrak elektronik. Jurnal Panah Keadilan, 1(2), 129.

[3] Az, L. S. (2019). Aspek hukum perjanjian. Penebar Media Pustaka.

[4] Basani, C. S., Saptana, D., & Suhardini, E. D. (2025). Kecakapan pihak yang melakukan kontrak digital melalui pembelian online dan pihak yang dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban atas barang yang sudah dibeli menurut peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(3), 190. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i3.3790

[5] Haryono, B. C., Bunyamin, V. Y. A., & H. D. H. (2022). Tinjauan hukum terhadap penerapan restorative. 15(11), 2.

[6] Fakhriah, S., Wisnu, S., & Hans, P. (2025). Analisis yuridis keabsahan smart contract dalam perspektif hukum perdata. 7(1), 47.

[7] Hutapea, K. W. H., & Sulistiyono, A. (2024). Keabsahan smart contract dengan teknologi blockchain menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(3), 86–94.

[8] Kandriana, M., Atika, S., Muslimin, & Wildan, M. H. (2025). Syarat subjektif dan objektif perjanjian jual beli: Relevansi Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata dalam praktik modern. Unes Law Review, 8(1), 224.

[9] Kadly, E. I., Rosadi, S. D., & Gultom, E. (2021). Keabsahan blockchain–smart contract dalam transaksi elektronik: Indonesia, Amerika dan Singapura. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 5(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v5i1.14128

[10] Kurniawan, N. S., Tektona, R. I., & Wardhana, R. W. (2025). Implikasi hukum penggunaan smart contract dalam transaksi initial coin offering di Indonesia. Simbur Cahaya, XXXII(1), 58–59. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v32i1.4366

[11] Lasut, E. T., Tamponggangoy, G. H., & F. K. G. M. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban dan perlindungan hukum perdata menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lex Crimen, X(12), 148.

[12] Lubis, T. H. (2022). Hukum perjanjian Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi SOSEK, 2(3), 177–190.

[13] Martha, M. E. S. (2017). Hukum perdata (Vol. 3). CV Nata Karya.

[14] Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Metode penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi). Prenada Media Group.

[15] Mazalio, I., & G. (2023). Problematika penerapan smart contract terhadap peran dan fungsi notaris di Indonesia. Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(3), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.58344/jmi.v2i3.198

[16] Nasihuddin, A. A. (2024). Teori hukum Pancasila. CV Elvaretta Buana.

[17] Oktaviani, S. (2021). Implementasi smart contract pada teknologi blockchain dalam kaitannya dengan notaris sebagai pejabat umum. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9(11), 2206. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i11.p18

[18] OpenSea Marketplace. (n.d.). Age restrictions OpenSea & terms of service OpenSea.

[19] Permatasari, P., Sukindar, & B. K. P. (2024). Keabsahan perjanjian arisan online dalam perspektif hukum perdata. 9(2), 219.

[20] Rum, G. W. (2025). Penggunaan alat bukti elektronik dalam proses peradilan perdata. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 2(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v2i1.3151

[21] Silitonga, H. D., Windari, R. A., & N. A. S. (2024). Analisis keabsahan smart contract transaksi aset digital di platform Ethereum dalam teknologi blockchain. 7(1), 9.

[22] Sukmaningsih, N. K. I. A., Pratama, I. P. A., & Prathama, A. A. G. A. I. (2025). Paradigma baru dalam pembaharuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata: Upaya adaptasi terhadap dinamika hukum di era digital dan globalisasi. Jurnal Yustitia, 20(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.62279/yustitia.v20i1.1459

[23] Wahyuni, H. A., Naili, Y. T., & Ruhtiani, M. (2023). Penggunaan smart contract pada transaksi e-commerce dalam perspektif hukum perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum In Concreto, 2(1), 10.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-17

How to Cite

Asan, M. L., & Amelia Azis, R. (2026). Legal Validity of Smart Contracts as a Digital Contract Mechanism in Online Buying and Selling Transactions (E-Commerce) on the Opensea Application. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 6(1), 433–440. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.351