Effectiveness of Constructed Wetland with a Variety of Plants in Processing Nickel Mining Waste
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v6i1.300Abstract
This study evaluates a pilot-scale constructed wetland for treating nickel mine wastewater from Watulabu Pond using combinations of Phragmites australis, Typha latifolia, and Chrysopogon zizanioides grown on topsoil and nickel slag–amended substrates. A mixed quantitative–qualitative approach was applied to assess technical performance (removal of TSS, Ni, and Cr⁶⁺), economic feasibility (operational costs relative to chemical treatment), and alignment with Indonesian environmental regulations for the nickel mining sector. All three macrophytes acclimatized well to nickel‑rich wastewater, but vetiver grass showed the strongest physiological response, with the highest plant height growth rate (1.00 cm/day) and vigorous tiller formation during 14 days of operation. Initial Cr⁶⁺ and total Cr concentrations of 1.73 mg/L and 1.99 mg/L (approximately 17× and 4× above national standards) were substantially reduced, with vetiver lowering Cr⁶⁺ and total Cr to 0.07 mg/L and 0.18 mg/L, respectively, both below discharge limits. TSS decreased from 350 mg/L to as low as 4.5–8.0 mg/L in topsoil‑based systems, corresponding to removal efficiencies up to 98.31%, while Fe and Ni removals consistently exceeded 90% in vegetated reactors. Vetiver achieved the highest metal removal efficiencies (Cr⁶⁺ 96.19%, total Cr 90.98%, total Fe 95.84%, total Ni 96.02%) and the greatest removal rates (0.111 mg/L/day for Cr⁶⁺ and 0.121 mg/L/day for total Cr), supported by very high Bioconcentration Factor values for total Cr (7,272.87) and Cr⁶⁺ (134.37), indicating exceptional root accumulation. In contrast, nickel slag–amended media showed lower accumulation capacity and, in some cases, negative removal for Cr species, suggesting chromium leaching and confirming pure topsoil as the more suitable substrate. Operational cost analysis revealed that the constructed wetland reduced treatment costs from IDR 2,300 to IDR 750 per m³ (≈67% savings) compared with manual chemical dosing, while producing effluents that meet national standards for TSS, Ni, and Cr in the best configurations. Overall, the findings demonstrate that appropriately designed constructed wetlands—particularly those using vetiver on topsoil—can simultaneously achieve high removal of Cr⁶⁺, Ni, Fe, and TSS, lower operating costs, and improve regulatory compliance, offering a technically robust and economically attractive option for sustainable nickel mine wastewater management in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
[1] Afzal, M., Arslan, M., Müller, J. A., Shabir, G., Islam, E., Tahseen, R., & Anwar-ul-Haq, M. (2019). Floating treatment wetlands as a suitable option for large-scale wastewater treatment. Chemosphere, 225, 109–118.
[2] Armstrong, W., & Drew, M. C. (2002). Root growth and metabolism under oxygen deficiency. In Y. Waisel, A. Eshel, & U. Kafkafi (Eds.), Plant roots: The hidden half (3rd ed., pp. 729–761). Marcel Dekker.
[3] Brix, H. (1997). Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Science and Technology, 35(5), 11–17.
[4] Crusciol, C. A. C., Fernandes, A. M., Moretti, L. G., Bossolani, J. W., & Kuramae, E. E. (2022). Nickel dynamics in soil–plant systems under tropical conditions. Environmental Pollution, 309, 119747.
[5] Fendorf, S. E. (1995). Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters. Geoderma, 67(1–2), 55–71.
[6] He, Y., Xu, J., Jia, Y., Liu, Z., & Wang, J. (2016). Buffering capacity and pollutant removal in constructed wetlands with different substrates. Ecological Engineering, 91, 205–213.
[7] Lottermoser, B. G. (2010). Mine wastes: Characterization, treatment and environmental impacts (3rd ed.). Springer.
[8] Nordstrom, D. K. (2011). Mine waters: Acidic to circumneutral. Elements, 7(6), 393–398.
[9] Pat-Espadas, A. M., Lopez-Luna, J., Rodríguez-Campos, J., & Poggi-Varaldo, H. M. (2018). Substrate selection for constructed wetlands treating industrial wastewater. Environmental Technology, 39(5), 637–650.
[10] Shokoohi, R., Eslami, H., & Riahi, H. (2025). Role of redox potential in heavy metal mobility in wetland systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 345, 119267.
[11] Swarnakar, R., Singh, S., & Bhatnagar, A. (2023). Substrate influence on performance of constructed wetlands for heavy metal removal. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 52, 103593.
[12] Ye, S., Zeng, G., Wu, H., Zhang, C., Liang, J., Dai, J., & Cheng, M. (2022). Behavior of nickel in mining-impacted environments: A review. Science of the Total Environment, 806, 150635.
[13] Younger, P. L. (2001). Mine water pollution and remediation. In P. L. Younger, S. A. Banwart, & R. S. Hedin (Eds.), Mine water: Hydrology, pollution, remediation (pp. 1–22). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[14] Republik Indonesia. (2001). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 82 Tahun 2001 tentang Pengelolaan Kualitas Air dan Pengendalian Pencemaran Air.
[15] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 9 Tahun 2006 tentang Baku Mutu Air Limbah bagi Usaha dan/atau Kegiatan Pertambangan Bijih Nikel.
[16] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 tentang Tata Cara dan Persyaratan Pengelolaan Air Limbah dengan Metode Lahan Basah Buatan (Constructed Wetland).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lionie Lionie, Bieby Voijant Tangahu, Umar Kasmon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
