The Strategic Role Of The Head Of The National Road Implementation Agency (BPJN) Palangkaraya In Managing The Risk Of Infrastructure Project Delays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i4.260Abstract
Infrastructure development is one of the Indonesian government’s top priorities to support economic growth and promote equitable development across regions. However, project delays remain a significant challenge that hinders the effectiveness of national strategic programs. This study aims to analyze the strategic role of the Head of the National Road Implementation Agency (BPJN) Palangkaraya in managing the risk of delays in infrastructure projects, particularly national road projects in Central Kalimantan. The research employs a qualitative approach with a case study design, involving in-depth interviews with the Head of BPJN and several project implementation officials as key informants. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns of strategic decision-making in responding to project uncertainties. The results reveal that decision-making processes are carried out through a combination of rational and intuitive approaches, taking into account technical aspects, fiscal policies, and external factors such as weather conditions and material distribution. The Head of BPJN acts as an adaptive decision-maker who balances national interests with field realities. This study underscores the importance of risk-based strategic leadership in improving the performance of public infrastructure projects.
Downloads
References
[1] Assaf, S. A., & Al-Hejji, S. (2006). Causes of delay in large construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(4), 349–357.
[2] Bayunayasa, I. M. A., Sunarsih, N. M., & Yudana, I. M. (2020). Factors affecting construction project delays: A study in Indonesia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(2), 1–10.
[3] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
[4] Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
[5] David, F. R., & David, F. R. (2017). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Pearson.
[6] Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.
[7] Heizer, J., Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations management: Sustainability and supply chain management (12th ed.). Pearson.
[8] Kaming, P. F., Olomolaiye, P., Holt, G. D., & Harris, F. C. (1997). Factors influencing construction time and cost overruns on high-rise projects in Indonesia. Construction Management and Economics, 15(1), 83–94.
[9] Kerzner, H. (2017). Project management: A systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling (12th ed.). Wiley.
[10] Love, P. E. D., Ika, L. A., Ahiaga-Dagbui, D., & Smith, J. (2020). Fault detection and validity of project management research: Time for a rethink? International Journal of Project Management, 38(3), 136–150.
[11] Masombe, S., Sitorus, A., & Nurcahyo, R. (2021). Risk factors and project delays in construction projects. International Journal of Construction Project Management, 13(1), 21–33.
[12] Moore, M. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
[13] PMI. (2017). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.
[14] Prameswari, A. (2020). Analisis penyebab keterlambatan proyek jalan di Kalimantan Tengah. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Indonesia, 11(2), 115–124.
[15] Prasetyo, W., & Firdaus, N. (2019). Infrastruktur dan pertumbuhan ekonomi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 20(1), 45–56.
[16] Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
[17] Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). Sage.
[18] Sambasivan, M., & Soon, Y. W. (2007). Causes and effects of delays in Malaysian construction industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 517–526.
[19] Soeharto, I. (1999). Manajemen proyek: Dari konseptual sampai operasional. Erlangga.
[20] Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
[21] Sukindrawati, A., & Kartika, H. (2022). Leadership and project performance in public construction works. Asian Journal of Project Management, 5(4), 122–134.
[22] Turban, E., Sharda, R., & Delen, D. (2019). Decision support and business intelligence systems. Pearson.
[23] Wideman, R. M. (1992). Project and program risk management: A guide to managing project risks and opportunities. PMI.
[24] Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. [11] M.T. Doménech-Carbó, M.F. Silva, E. Aura-Castro, A. Doménech-Carbó, L. Fuster-López, J.V. Gimeno-Adelantado, S.U. Kröner, M.L. Martínez-Bazán, X. Más-Barberá, M.F. Mecklenburg, L. Osete-Cortina, D.J. Yusá-Marco, Multitechnique approach to evaluate cleaning treatments for acrylic and polyvinyl acetate paints, in: New insights into the cleaning of paintings (editors: M.F. Mecklenburg, A.E. Charola, R.J. Koestler), Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press, 2013, pp. 125-134.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Aziz Ahmad Faris, Achmad Syamsudin, Gema Borneo Poetra, Jonathan Giovanni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
