Settlement of The Conflict Between The Republic of The Philippines and The People's Republic of China Through The Permanent Court of Arbitration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i4.246Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explain the background of the resolution of the South China Sea conflict between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China through the Permanent Court of Arbitration. This thesis is grounded in a fundamental framework of thought that combines international security theory and international legal theory. In searching for data sources, the researcher employed a qualitative method. The results of this study explain that the international arbitration decision confirms that the islands claimed by China do not meet the requirements for a right to an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) or a wide continental shelf. The Philippines is considered the rightful owner of the area included in its exclusive economic zone in accordance with UNCLOS. In addition, this decision emphasizes that China’s actions in building islands and placing infrastructure in the disputed area violate the rights of the Philippines and the principles of international law. In addition, based on the author’s interviews with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the results indicate that the South China Sea conflict between the Chinese and Philippine governments is a latent issue that is very difficult to resolve.
Downloads
References
Adhimarif, Adam Risman. "Analysis Of The People's Republic Of China's Rejection Of The Results Of The Permanent Court Of Arbitration Decision On The Philippines' Lawsuit In The South China Sea In 2016." Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2019.
Adi, Danang Wahyu Setyo. "Analysis of Settlement of South China Sea Disputes by the International Arbitration Agency." Lex Generalis Law Journal. 2, no. 1 (2021): 8–11.
Andre Iancu and Paul R. Michel, (2022) “The Solution to Chinese Courts’ Increasingly Aggressive Overreach,” Center for Strategic and International Studies,
Andrew Jones, (2023) “China to Establish Organization to Coordinate International Moon Base,” Space News, April 28, 2023.
Anna Gelpern et al., (2021) “How China Lends: A Rare Look into 100 Debt Contracts with Foreign Governments,” Center for Global Development.
Audrye Wong, (2022) “The Diaspora and China’s Foreign Influence Activ- ities,” Wilson Center.
Aruna Viswanatha and Kate O’Keefe, (2020) “China’s New Tool to Chase Down Fugitives: American Courts,” Wall Street Journal.
Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative, (2019) “Reading between the Lines: The Next Spratly Legal Dispute,” Center for Strategic and International Studies,
Angela Zhang, (2021) China’s Antitrust Exceptionalism, Oxford University Press, 2021, 10–15.
Associated Press, (2015) “Qualcomm Hit with Record Fine in Chinese Anti-Monopoly Case,” NPR.
Adrian Shahbaz, “The Rise of Digital Authoritarianism,” Freedom House, Oc- tober 2018, 8.
Andriani, Agustini. "Legal consequences of annulment of arbitral awards in relation to the principle of final and binding." AL-MANHAJ: Journal of Islamic Law and Social Institutions 4, no. 1 (2022): 25–36. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i1.1528.
Arsyad, daughter of Nabila Kurnia. "Problems in the Implementation of the Final and Binding Principles in the Annulment of ICSID International Arbitration Awards on Investment Disputes." Rectum JournaL: Juridical Review of the Handling of Criminal Acts 5, no. 1 (2023): 691. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.2783.
Adler, E. (1997). Seizing the middle ground: Constructivism in world politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319-363.
Ariel Cohen, (2021) “China’s Space Mining Industry is Prepping for Launch—But What about the US?” Forbes.
Alex Lee, (2021) “Personal Data, Global Effects: China’s Draft Privacy Law in the International Context,” DigiChin.
Ankit Panda, (2019) “China Warns Vietnam to Not ‘Complicate’ South China Sea Dispute by Seeking Legal Arbi- tration,” Diplomat
Advincula, J. V., Jr. (2015). China’s leadership transition and the future of US-China relations: Insights from the Spratly Islands case. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 20, 51-65.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fikri Ardiyansyah, Jeremias Adams, Thomas Adams, Amalia Amaya Navarro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
