The Environment As A Legal Subject: A Post- Humanist Philosophical Perspective

Authors

  • Hyronimus Rhiti Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i4.243

Abstract

The accelerating ecological crisis and the persistent anthropocentric orientation of legal systems have revealed significant limitations in traditional jurisprudence. Environmental degradation, climate change, and biodiversity loss underscore the urgency of rethinking legal frameworks that historically prioritize human interests over the rights and integrity of ecosystems. This study aims to explore the concept of the environment as a legal subject through the lens of post-humanist philosophy, emphasizing the ethical, ontological, and legal rationales for extending subjectivity beyond human entities. The research employs a philosophical and conceptual method, critically analyzing the theoretical foundations of legal subjectivity, post-humanist thought, and the moral standing of non-human entities. It synthesizes insights from legal philosophy, environmental ethics, and jurisprudence to construct a coherent framework for recognizing ecological systems as holders of rights within legal orders. The findings indicate that post-humanist philosophy provides a robust conceptual justification for acknowledging ecosystems as legal subjects. By decentering humans and emphasizing relationality among all living and non-living entities, law can be reoriented to protect the intrinsic value of nature, promote ecological sustainability, and ensure intergenerational justice. The study also identifies practical pathways for integrating ecological subjectivity into legal systems, including through the appointment of legal guardians for ecosystems and the adoption of rights-based frameworks in constitutional and statutory law. This research contributes to the theoretical discourse on environmental jurisprudence by offering a normative and philosophical basis for expanding the notion of legal subjectivity. It is expected to guide policymakers, scholars, and legal practitioners in developing laws that recognize the environment not merely as an object but as an active participant in legal and ethical frameworks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. D. Stone, “Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects,” Southern California Law Review, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 450–501, 1972.

B. Latour, Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.

D. R. Boyd, “The Rights of Nature: A Legal Revolution That Could Save the World,” EcoHealth, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2019.

J. Ruru, “Listening to Papatuanuku: A Call to Reform Water Law,” Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 215–224, 2019.

S. Rahardjo, “Progressive Law and Environmental Protection in Indonesia,” Asian Journal of Comparative Law, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 33–54, 2017.

J. Baeyaert, "The Evolution of Legal Personhood and Its Implications for Artificial Intelligence," TechReg Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 45-60, 2025.

"Legal Personhood for Non-Human Entities – The Future of AI and Environmental Rights," Obiter Dicta, Mar 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://obiterdicta.co.uk/202425-1/legal-personhood-for-non-human-entities-the-future-of-ai-and-environmental-rights.

J. Gilbert, "Understanding the Rights of Nature," Human Ecology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023.

C. Clark, "Book review: Jana Norman, Posthuman Legal Subjectivity: Reimagining the Human in the Anthropocene (Routledge, Abingdon 2022) 186 pp," Journal of Human Rights and the Environment, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2023.

P. Baard, "Rights of Nature Through a Legal Expressivist Lens," J. Ethics Environ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2024.

A. Leopold, A Sand County Almanac, Oxford University Press, 1949.

A. Næss, "The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary," Inquiry, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 95–100, 1973.

J. Barkan, "Corporate Personhood as Legal and Literary Fiction," in States, Firms, and Their Legal Fictions, M. J. Durkee, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024, pp. 261–282.

R. M. U. Azam, S. A. Zerin, and F. F. K. Alabi, "The Rights of Nature Movement: Legal, Cultural, and Policy Challenges in Implementing Eco-Centric Laws," Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2025.

K. Bosselmann and T. Williams, "The River as a Legal Person: The case of the Whanganui River in New Zealand," Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.boell.de/en/2025/01/29/river-legal-person-case-whanganui-river-new-zealand.

V. A. J. Kurki, "Can nature hold rights? It's not as easy as you think," Transnational Environmental Law, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 215–238, 2022.

G. Plowens, "A challenge to Te Kōpuka's allyships," Journal of Environmental Law and Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2024.

V. Kahui, "Comparative analysis of Rights of Nature case law: Ecuador and beyond," Environmental Law Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 120–135, 2024.

M. C. Fuchs, "The Concept of Rights of Nature in Colombia and Ecuador," World Heritage and Protected Areas, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 45–60, 2025.

S. Jolly, "Of Ebbs and Flows: Understanding the Legal Consequences of Granting Personhood to Natural Entities in India," Transnational Environmental Law, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 467–492, Nov. 2021.

M. Miller, "Environmental personhood and standing for nature," University of New Hampshire Law Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2019.

M. Cribb, E. Macpherson, and A. Borchgrevink, "Beyond legal personhood for the Whanganui River: Collaboration and pluralism in implementing the Te Awa Tupua Act," The International Journal of Human Rights, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 275–294, 2024.

M. Jodyvash, "The role of cultural pluralism in Indigenous peoples' defense of nature," Oñati Socio-Legal Series, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1–22, 2025.

S. Tabares, "Do hybrid organizations contribute to Sustainable Development Goals? Evidence from B Corps in Colombia," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 278, p. 123858, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Rhiti, H. (2025). The Environment As A Legal Subject: A Post- Humanist Philosophical Perspective. International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 5(4), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i4.243