Business Communication Strategy of PT Telekomunikasi Selular Surabaya Branch in Sponshorship Negotiation Process

Authors

  • Ira Datus Salamia Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Chitra Laksmi Rithmaya D3 Banking Economics, Universitas Hayam Wuruk Perbanas, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i3.199

Abstract

34In the face of increasingly competitive business environments, companies must develop effective communication strategies, particularly in establishing sponsorship collaborations. This study aims to examine the business communication strategies implemented by PT Telekomunikasi Selular (Telkomsel) Surabaya Branch in the sponsorship negotiation process with potential partners. The research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. The findings reveal that Telkomsel’s communication strategy involves systematic stages, the application of the 7C principles, and adaptive interpersonal approaches tailored to partner characteristics. Key success factors in negotiation include message clarity, value relevance, and the ability to build long-term relationships. Meanwhile, communication barriers such as perception gaps, mismatched expectations, and cultural challenges are among the obstacles encountered. Telkomsel addresses these challenges through clarification, proposal revisions, and two-way communication. These findings reinforce the importance of structured communication planning in building mutually beneficial business partnerships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[World Health Organization, "Cancer," 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

Fajrinur F, Handini MC, Tarigan FL, Harefa K, Ginting D. Ketidaklengkapan Pengisian Dokumen Clinical Pathway Kanker Paru (Studi Kualitatif di RSUP H. Adam Malik tahun 2021). J Healthc Technol Med. 2022;8(1):477–88.

Siddiqui F, Vaqar S, Siddiqu AH. Lung Cancer. StatPearls. 2023.

Wright NMA, Goss GD. Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8(Suppl 3):S247–64.

Sigismund S, Avanzato D, Lanzetti L. Emerging functions of the EGFR in cancer. Mol Oncol. 2018;12(1):3–20.

Bartholomew C, Eastlake L, Dunn P, Yiannakis D. EGFR targeted therapy in lung cancer; an evolving story. Respir Med Case Reports. 2017;20:137–40.

Chi A, Remick S, Tse W. EGFR inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future directions. Biomark Res. 2013;1(1):1.

Ellis PM, Coakley N, Feld R, Kuruvilla S, Ung YC. Use of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, and icotinib in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review. Curr Oncol. 2015;22(3):e183–215.

Tan CS, Kumarakulasinghe NB, Huang YQ, Ang YLE, Choo JRE, Goh BC, et al. Third generation EGFR TKIs: Current data and future directions. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):1–14.

Lahmadi M, Beddar L, Rouibah AL, Boumegoura A, Boufendi H, Temim A, et al. Analysis of EGFR Mutation Status in Algerian Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(4):1063–8.

Bian D, Sun L, Hu J, Duan L, Xia H, Zhu X, et al. Neoadjuvant Afatinib for stage III EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1–14.

Rodak O, Peris-Díaz MD, Olbromski M, Podhorska-Okołów M, Dzięgiel P. Current landscape of non-small cell lung cancer: Epidemiology, histological classification, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(18).

Hsu WH, Yang JCH, Mok TS, Loong HH. Overview of current systemic management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 1):i3–9.

Zhang P, Nie X, Bie Z, Li L. Impact of heavy smoking on the benefits from first-line EGFR-TKI therapy in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Medicine (United States). 2018;97(9):1–5.

Bian D, Sun L, Hu J, Duan L, Xia H, Zhu X, et al. Neoadjuvant Afatinib for stage III EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1–14.

Wu SG, Chang YL, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Shih JY. Lung adenocarcinoma patients of young age have lower EGFR mutation rate and poorer efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. ERJ Open Res. 2017;3(3).

Kobayashi Y, Togashi Y, Yatabe Y, Mizuuchi H, Jangchul P, Kondo C, et al. EGFR Exon 18 Mutations in Lung Cancer: Molecular Predictors of Augmented Sensitivity to Afatinib or Neratinib as Compared with First- or Third-Generation TKIs. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(23):5305–13.

Lahmadi M, Beddar L, Rouibah AL, Boumegoura A, Boufendi H, Temim A, et al. Analysis of EGFR Mutation Status in Algerian Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2021;22(4):1063–8.

Zheng M. Classification and Pathology of Lung Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25(3):447–68.

Setyawan UA, Tantular R, Bahar C. Survival Rate of Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients Receiving EGFR - Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Targeted Therapy. J Kedokt Brawijaya. 2023;32(3):165–70.

Chen YY, Yen YT, Lai WW, Huang WL, Chang CC, Tseng YL. Outcomes of salvage lung resections in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas under EGFR TKIs. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12(20):2655–65.

Sari S, Andayani TM, Endarti D, Widayati K. Efikasi Afatinib dan Gefitinib pada Pasien Non-small Cell Lung Cancer EGFR Mutasi Positif: Tinjauan Sistematis. Indones J Clin Pharm. 2019;8(4):289.

Arena C, Troiano G, De Lillo A, Testa NF, Lo Muzio L. Stomatitis and VEGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (VR-TKIs): A Review of Current Literature in 4369 Patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7–12.

Cárdenas-Fernández D, Pina PS, Turcott JG, Chávez-Tapia N, Conde-Flores E, Cardona AF, et al. Management of diarrhea induced by EGFR-TKIs in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Vaccines. 2018;9(6):259–61.

Aw DCW, Tan EH, Chin TM, Lim HL, Lee HY, Soo RA. Management of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related cutaneous and gastrointestinal toxicities. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018;14(1):23–31.

Zhu Y, Li L, Zhang P, Zuo Y, Lei Y, Bai J, et al. Severe stomatitis caused by osimertinib combined with gefitinib: A case report. Clin Case Reports. 2022;10(2):3–7.

Relhan V, Bansal A. Acute and chronic paronychia revisited: A narrative review. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2022;15(1):1–16.

Masago K, Irie K, Fujita S, Imamichi F, Okada Y, Katakami N, et al. Relationship between Paronychia and Drug Concentrations of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors. Oncology. 2018;95(4):251–6.

Kim Y, Lee SH, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Park K, Sun JM. Efficacy and safety of afatinib for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, compared with gefitinib or erlotinib. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):502–9.

HE J, HUANG Z, HAN L, GONG Y, XIE C. Mechanisms and management of 3rd-generation EGFR-TKI resistance in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (Review). Int J Oncol. 2021;59(5):1–20.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-08

How to Cite

Datus Salamia, I., & Laksmi Rithmaya, C. . (2025). Business Communication Strategy of PT Telekomunikasi Selular Surabaya Branch in Sponshorship Negotiation Process . International Journal of Science and Environment (IJSE), 5(3), 420–423. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijse.v5i3.199

Issue

Section

Articles